• 0 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: April 19th, 2023

help-circle




  • Kissaki@feddit.detoEurope@feddit.deMonthly users
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Multiple hundreds is considerable to me and beyond “hobby”. It doesn’t have to be a full time job or fairly compensated to be more than a hobby.

    1.5 k has to be considered in my eyes. It’s not negligible or marginal as donations. (Note I labeled donations considerable, not their income - which I don’t know. My point was that it’s worth mentioning.)



  • The constant need for observation and corrective corrections in politics and political institutions is exhausting.

    The need and cause are very foreign to me. I work problem-solution-oriented and person-neutral-collaborative in software development. Which is a personality and environment/systematic setup thing. And which of course sadly only works in smaller teams and groups and projects; not at the scale of EU politics.

    The tasks, obligations, and responsibilities of elected politicians are clear. But that alone is not enough. Which is kind of tragic.





  • The title made me think of something completely different from what he actually said (the quotes are in the article).

    • He specifically talks about national stupidity, not individual or people/citizen stupidity
    • He says the technology is neutral, the concern is in how it is being used


    What they’re saying is not that “stupidity is a bigger threat than AI”. They’re not separate ideas. He says he is worried about how AI is being used more than the technology and technological development itself.


    “With this in mind, artificial intelligence is a tool. It is an algorithm made by humans, that is run by computers made by humans, that controls machines made by humans. I am more afraid, more worried [about] national stupidity than artificial intelligence to be honest,” he added.

    “I have a scientific background, so I definitely consider technology as neutral. The problem is the user, not the technology itself.”


  • The EU already puts a price on many of the emissions created by European firms; now, through the new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, or CBAM, the bloc will charge companies that import the targeted products

    The new regulations include an important nudge to other governments. CBAM regulations state that if a company pays a carbon fee at home, it won’t also have to pay the EU—just the difference, if the EU’s price is higher.







  • The European Union cut off more than $100 billion in funding to Poland as part of its dispute with the previous government, funds that began to be reinstated once voters elected the new, liberal government committed to doing away with Law and Justice’s changes.

    It’s always baffling to read how much money the EU sends out in funding - not just to EU states, but in general to support EU values even outside of the EU.

    Cutting off 100 billion in funding is certainly noteworthy.


    Very interesting article about how they were able to free the media.