Removed by mod

Steak?? Really??

I can understand burger, fillet, sausage as the/fundamentally-based-on the process of preparation/construction. But not for steak. Subjectively anyway.

Looking at steak on Wikipedia:

A steak is a thick cut of meat generally sliced across the muscle fibers, sometimes including a bone. It is normally grilled or fried. Steak can be diced, cooked in sauce, such as in steak and kidney pie, or minced and formed into patties, such as hamburgers.

Grilled portobello mushroom may be called mushroom steak, and similarly for other vegetarian dishes. Imitation steak is a food product that is formed into a steak shape from various pieces of meat. Grilled fruits such as watermelon have been used as vegetarian steak alternatives.

Exceptions, in which the meat is sliced parallel to the fibers, include the skirt steak cut from the plate, the flank steak cut from the abdominal muscles, and the silverfinger steak cut from the loin and including three rib bones. In a larger sense, fish steaks, ground meat steaks, pork steak, and many more varieties of steak are known.

I guess I’m just not enough into steaks. I guess it can be a label for the process before a meat steak.

From the court press release:

Access by the police, in the context of a criminal investigation, to the personal data stored on a mobile telephone may constitute a serious, or even particularly serious, interference with the fundamental rights of the data subject. However, it is not necessarily limited to the fight against serious crime. The national legislature must define the factors to be taken into account for such access, such as the nature or categories of the offences concerned. In order to ensure compliance with the principle of proportionality in each specific case, the examination of which involves weighing all the relevant factors of the individual case, that access must, moreover, be subject to prior authorisation by a court or an independent authority, save in duly substantiated cases of urgency. The data subject must be informed of the grounds for the authorisation as soon as the provision of this information is no longer likely to jeopardise the investigations.

• National law needs to define when police may access
• A court must approve - weighing proportionality
• Only in duly substantiated cases of urgency court approval may be skipped
• The subject must be informed once that act no longer jeopardizes the investigation

The court demands local legislation to define where it is allowed, and requires a court approval to weigh interests of privacy vs investigation.

It’s really not about police randomly deciding to access phone data.

Article 9.5 of this directive leaves the door open for each country to decide whether or not to require companies with fewer than 100 employees […] to publish this information.

Absurd.

It’s also kind of crazy that even in the state Russia is in, the administration still has to look out for how they are perceived. Despite its oppression and control.

The remainder gets imported

32,1+26,6+14,8+7+5,1+1,4+1,1 = 88,1

So 11,9 % gets/got imported?

According to Swierk et al., nine of those 10 inks did not meet EU regulations; five simply failed to list all the components, but four contained prohibited ingredients.

It could explain why Norway is ahead of other countries. With an abundance of electricity, I assume it was also easier to fund and promote infrastructure and other incentives.

I don’t know how electricity compares concretely to fuel between filling the tank and acquisition cost.

Norway has a lot of and cheap hydro-produced electricity power. They’re in a good precondition for it. It’s not that surprising because of that.