It was a non binding referendum, they had no reason to give a shit. They still voted for the fuckwits that enforced the non-binding resolution and made it law.

You get what you vote for.

It’s also why politicians love non-voters, one less moron you have to convince.

It’s never really been conservatism, it’s regressivism. They want Feudalism because they think they can be king.

You’re the problematic stuff and we’re calling you out.

You’re the only person concerned about race here. Stop being racist.

People act like the Afghani army that the US spent years trying to rebuild didn’t just up and run away.

You are allowed, just ask what it means. Don’t be a whiney little bitch that people aren’t hand feeding you every scrap of information, nobody is cognizant of your ignorance so don’t blame yours on them.

Your wilful ignorance is rude and wrong.

Yes we are, the rest of us are cognizant of more than just the article. You should try it some time.

deleted by creator

There’s people on both sides of every fence who get there through circumstance rather than cognizance.

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupitiy, and I’m not so sure about the universe.” - attributed to Albert Einstein

Using initialisms prompt self learning for those that will, and wilful ignorance for those that will not. No one is responsible for anyone elses individual lack of capacity. Funny how your situation only encourages introspection in one half of the conversation.

It’s a 400 year time period, you could make just about any valid excuse for the use of either, both have been used together for 200 years, and inflame is older than inflammable by 200 years.

Yeah the AI definitely picked up on some firefighter influence, this was one that came up that almost had a helmet and jacket, maybe even some Canadian mountie,

Joke killer:

Flame - fire.
Flammable - has the potential to be set on fire. (eg. burn, ember, catch)

Inflame - to burst into fire.
Inflammable - has the potential to burst into fire. (eg. explode, detonate, erupt)

Non-flammable - cannot result in flame.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk. Blame the Ancient Greeks for this wonderful bit of English.

I misstyped. It’s supposed to be younger not older. Older cars are still required to show the correct speed however in 2004 manufacturers started putting in a ‘buffer’.

Cars manufactured before 2004 will generally have a very exact speedo that has the potential to display below the travelling speed under certain circumstances, eg bigger wheels than intented for the vehicle, overinflated tires, etc.

After 2004 manufacturer’s started putting in a ‘buffer’ of anywhere between 4 to 12 km/h due to new regulation preventing the previously mentioned situation.

For example a Taraga people mover can be anywhere from 7 to 12km under the displayed speed, Camry hybrids are almost always about 4km/h slower than their shown speed, Prius are mostly 5km/h slower on the dot.

My 2002 Camry is on the money.

Experience: Few years as a taxi driver.

Why is she trusting a speed detection sign in the first place, she had a speedometer that has a guaranteed margin of error in all cars older than 2004, and a legal requirement to never show above the actual travel speed. It sounds like a cop out, either the camera was not functioning properly or these people are just country lead foots. Given that I only need to go 15 mins out of the city to see people drive significantly over the limits with regularity. Wouldn’t surprise me if half these folks have never even looked down below the dash what with keeping an eye out for pigs and roos.

Poe’s law my friend.