I call betteridge’s law on this one

They way most democracies are now, they are helpless against rich people buying press and lobbying for politicians

I hope the necessary change comes fast enough

Did he mean Tim Apple?

Darth Plagueis

I assume the problem is the following:

If there is dirt on a Democrat, the Republicans read it to feel backed up on their opinion and the democrats read it to see if it is true and if they need to demonstrate for a change in leadership

If there is dirt on a republican, the Republicans ignore it because they don’t believe it, and many democrats ignore it because they allready know it3

Ok, but it is really fucked up how transparent voting seems to be for you guys in the US:

How do you know who didn’t vote?

				We formed a Super PAC and bought the personal voting records of every American citizen from a data broker we found on the internet. It’s pretty fucked up. 			

How do you know who’s “blue leaning”?

				We got your partisan lean from the same data broker who sold us your voting history. You wouldn’t believe how easy it was for us to get this stuff. So fucked up! 			

I used to love your card games before you got all political.

				Your mom used to love you before you got so fucking stupid. 			

We have very limited information about the inner organ work of dinosaurs. We therefore can not be certain if they cause gonorrhea or not.

#10

:.|:; Is this spam?

Is this loss?

Is this loss?

Is this loss?

Is this loss?

Is this loss?

Rudolph the rednosed reindeer

It is bad to be different as long as it is not economically exploitable

I have the concept of prove

I mean, I am pretty sure after 23 years in guantanamo, they would admit to killing jfk and Franz Ferdinand as well

Yes, but proven to be bought by the Saudis and alleged to be blackmailed by Russia just does not seem to be the topic voters care about