Same on all points
Same on all points
Well I’m glad that you were able to get it to work again then and that it is fixed now
Going from your suggestions I was able to find a workaround to change the device’s state with just one click, so thank you for that.
For the second problem, it seems that while HA sends a command instantly, it only actually changes states on the dashboard once the device sensors update, which seems to be hard coded to happen about every 30 seconds. I am using an integration from HACS (Custom VeSync) though, so I feel like the problem is more likely to do with my own setup. Then again HA would previously just send the requested command no matter what the state was before…
Either way I’m not really familiar with Github beyond reading release notes and readmes.
Edit: Reading further into the integration I’m using, I realized that it relies on cloud polling. I wonder if there’s a way to make Home Assistant assume that a command went through, change states immediately, and then confirm the change with the next polling cycle, rather than just waiting. Unfortunately I don’t know how to implement something like this.
I do have one problem with the new humidifier cards. Some buttons got shuffled around and now turning a device off and on went from being a single click to three separate operations. Additionally, it is less reliable now, as it won’t send a turn on/off command instantly, rather only when the state of the device changes in HA. I don’t toggle them frequently, but when I do I want it to be fast. I’m sure there’s some workaround for it, but it just worked previously and now it just doesn’t.
What went wrong for you? I didn’t have any problems with the last one or this one so far (I use Z2M)
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-Earth
Wait until they find out how much water goes into meat and clothing production
I believe it’s content warning
The only devices I have that are on Wi-Fi are ones I got before learning about HA. Zigbee FTW 👍
China is a very big place with a lot of people. It makes sense that we would find things there that we haven’t elsewhere
Turns out it’s difficult to make a tower stand up straight for 900 years
It’s also coarse, irritating, and rough
Believe it or not, but the engineers over there did probably actually think about this. Starlink isn’t competing with other providers that are at higher orbits such as Geostationary. They are deliberately placed lower for lower cost and transmission delay. When going from LEO to GEO, the limits of the speed of light make a tangible difference in latency between the satellite and the ground. In addition, the orders of magnitude lower cost to deliver to the lower orbit allows them to send many many more satellites, which increases throughout enough to make satellite internet actually usable for high bandwidth tasks.
Individual Starlink satellites are not permanent. You can argue whether it makes sense to constantly have to replace satellites in order to get more speed and lower latency, but that has nothing at all to do with some sort of engineering mistake. Comparing the longevity of Starlink satellites to satellite television, GPS, ISS, etc. is like comparing fuel mileage between a Prius and the Saturn V Crawler-transporter. They are in no means competing on this factor.
Because it’s a bogus story. It’s like saying that the leaves fell from a tree or water evaporated from a lake. The satellites are deorbiting because that’s what they are designed to do, rather than hanging around as space trash for hundreds of years.
Titanfall
Yes, a smaller, more efficient, and faster one.
I’m no scientist. A full tank tends to go farther on a diesel model than a gasoline one 🤷
And transportation… and production…
In Europe, diesel is usually cheaper and burns slower, so it saves money.
Sarcasm sure, but I would say that nothing about it is subtle