In my mind Teasers were made before production started, to announce the movie was being made. They didn’t have any actually movie clips.

Now it seems, if it’s more than 3 months from release, even full trailers, they get called a teaser. That’s the only distinction anymore I think.

The linked announcement is satire. And hysterical.
But the acquisition is also real.

The Onion isn’t news.
What’s this doing here?

Edit: OH! The Onion actually, really, genuinely, bought InfoWars! OK I get it.

If they’re using time travel to create a causality loop, that’s different than a time loop.

Time loops usually reset causality, accept for those actually experiencing the loop iterations.

Haven’t seen it, but sounds like it. Time travel can certainly be used to create loops.

I say no.

Time travel stories are about going to a different time.
Time loop stories are repeating the same time.
It’s really that simple.

Time loops are anti-time travel really, as there’s no movement in time at all.

Oh! Now I get it. You’re talking about something I wasn’t. It’s true none of that has anything to do with the rules specifically, like I thought. But instead, you want to talk about some broader point we weren’t thinking or talking about. Okay. Yes your right. It matters to the larger situation, beyond the scope of our immediate discussion. Thank you for explaining.

I’m not sure how any that matters to any campaign finance rules that might prevent Biden from giving his war chest to another candate?

People don’t even take turns in a circular firing squad.
I have no idea what you’re talking about any more.

Neutrality is about not treating some forms of data different than others.
Data caps are still neutral. They don’t care what kind of data you use, only how much.

That’s not to say they aren’t a problem. Just a different one.

It’s not an argument. It’s an excuse.
A post-hoc justification, given as a robotic response to my explaining how it’s false.
In this exchange it’s literal nonsense.

That could be.
That’s not what I was thinking.
Thinking again, that seems quite likely.

No candidates stepped forward.

Because Biden ran.
I said that.
That was the whole point of what I said.

You don’t seem to be participating anyway.

That makes sense.

Biden never should have run a second time at all. His running scared away any other candates. If he clearly said he wouldn’t run for a second term, they could’ve had a full open primary with a dozen candates or more.

As it was, they did everything they could to discourage a real, full primary process.

Even after he was forced out, he could’ve not handed he’s entire campaign war chest and staff to Harris. And instead had a contested convention where candates lobbied attendees for their votes. Like used be done a century ago. Then given all his campaign resources to that nominee.

She’s not saying Harris needed a few more weeks. She’s saying Biden never should have gone for a second term, and they should have had a real primary process to choose a better candate. Which was a mistake I pointed out when Biden announced his second run.

Technically, legally, it is that simple.
All it takes is some courage.

That’s not how that works.

The average mainstream American likes Christmas.
The average mainstream American doesn’t own 90 ugly Christmas Sweaters so they can wear a different one every day for 2 months.

You are the latter.

I’d get back to the judge today, saying we’re ready to procede as planned. His employment status is unrelated to the case.