Well the top comment was “fuck these people” so if the goal was to build broad public support it is having the opposite effect.
Alternatively, EVERYONE is cheering for those fucking Orcas, so… Imagine being dumber than a whale.
Well the top comment was “fuck these people” so if the goal was to build broad public support it is having the opposite effect.
Alternatively, EVERYONE is cheering for those fucking Orcas, so… Imagine being dumber than a whale.
The one China policy is just a diplomatic hedge.
Everyone will SAY there is “one China”, but nations can make defense pacts with specific “parts” of China, even in the event of “invasion” from a different part of that same “one China”.
One China is about those mental gymnastics. Buying into “one China” isn’t about supporting the reunification of Taiwan. Never was. It’s the opposite.
Crime, boy… I don’t know
Yeah. Not embarrassed about this at all. And a narrative that I should be is bizzare to me.
Removed by mod
Moments before what in retrospect was inevitable, Jeremy realized he shouldn’t have crammed his rectal cavity with cheddar cheese that morning.
For a billion dollars I have a guaranteed plan to reduce operating expenses by 45 billion. Board of telsa feel free to hit up my DMs
If the goal is to visualize growth trends, I don’t think raw user counts are the correct value to track on the Y-axis at all. That’s where my head was at when I said it doesn’t make sense. Abusing the Y-axis to try and coax data out in this case is just a symptom of having the wrong measure.
Daily new users. Percent user growth.
Yeah when I showed the cop the graph of my speed before getting in my car to be 67000mph (speed of the earth around the sun) to 67080mphwhen I was driving it he couldn’t see the difference so I didn’t get the ticket.
Or sometimes choosing a common-sense reference makes sense.
Which isn’t to say THIS one does, it doesn’t, but the absolutism of “it’s nerf or nothing” is a tad extreme.
Is it explicitly stated whom a president may not pardon (eg, themselves)?
If so, no reason to anyone to do anything if he’s elected
Academic Journals frantically spinning up botnets to retweet this
One is your education and one is your job. It’d be like me chirping someone with a geophysics degree who’s working at Starbucks.
(and mitochondrial DNA is inherited exclusively from the mother)
It’s certainly something besides latitude. Western Canada grows hella tomatoes and that’s 49 lat at the bare minimum
If I were US law enforcement reading this story, I’d have a sudden urge to make sure Joe Exotic was still in his cell.
I’m not a lawyer, so interested in learning…
Isn’t this what the purpose of objecting is? If the defense fails to object while it’s happening… Isn’t that kinda on them?
Let’s sing another song, boys. This one’s grown old and bitter.
It’s not Wednesday
I think a lot of people believe the science in this article to be problematic. Another poster went into several reasons. It’s heavy on persuasive language, shy of facts, and many of the facts are suspect, and it hasn’t been accepted by any publications so it hasn’t gotten any peer review. It’s possible it hasn’t gotten any publication because the apparently quality is so low.
It might be that people see your comment as accepting the validity of the claims which suspiciously have no peer review, and are then jumping the gun by associating it to things which ARE well scientifically established like climate change.
It’s kinda leaping to an ethical and political discussion when there are a lot of outstanding questions about the science. And this is /c/science.
I can’t speak for others. I didn’t downvote you. But, your comment wasn’t really… Science?
I’m not in a place to actually help as I’m on vacation: but since it’s a compile issue, if you posted a minimally failing-to-compilr version (no credentials) of your full YAML someone could conceivably be able to troubleshoot it