What makes you think I support that traitor? I just think your idea is bad
What makes you think I support that traitor? I just think your idea is bad
Restricting people’s rights to make a point doesn’t either
two wrongs don’t make a right
Nikki Haley is the backup, she’s already got a few delegates to make it official.
Too bad that even if he died, a significant part of his supporters would probably vote for him anyways thinking he’s secretly alive
deleted by creator
The main carbon capture I want is reforestation
I don’t think capitalism is to blame for a King’s vanity project
All of it. I want the AFU to have so much US-supplied ordinance that it makes Helldivers look prophetic
I would have liked that, I really enjoyed his performance in Loki
Saudi Arabia got appointed the chair to try to shame them into doing better, it’s not because the UN is anti gender equality
Or in not cynical terms: if your dog loves a toy to death, buy some replacements
Well now I need an excuse to make one
Thanks for pointing it out.
Thanks for the screenshot ❤️
The study referenced cites another study that showed the causation in kids for music and cognitive skills. So it’s a good question to ask
Who did the study anyway? CAP?
Studies in Comparative International Development (SCID) is an interdisciplinary journal that addresses issues concerning political, social, economic, and environmental change in local, national, and international contexts.
The journal has a tradition of presenting critical and innovative analytical perspectives that challenge prevailing orthodoxies. It publishes original research articles on all world regions and is open to all theoretical and methodical approaches.
I didn’t waste my time studying a study
If checking before you spout something incorrect is “wasting your time”, then why should anyone take what you say seriously?
It took me way less long to check than it did to write this comment, who’s wasting time here?
According to one study 🙄
A study that samples 148 different articles, I’m sure you reviewed a good selection of them before you came to a different conclusion than the study did, right?
It’s not like you just named 6 very different politicians and claimed they’re all the same because “neoliberal”, that would be exactly my point.
According to one study of 148 scholarly articles, neoliberalism is almost never defined but used in several senses to describe ideology, economic theory, development theory, or economic reform policy. It has become used largely as a term of abuse and/or to imply a laissez-faire market fundamentalism virtually identical to that of classical liberalism – rather than the ideas of those who attended the 1938 colloquium.
Neoliberalism = liberalism I don’t like
“Humans are struggling to adjust”
Skill issue
I see, so it’s the naval version of the stick battles on the Indian border