![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/2665e448-91d9-484d-919d-113c9715fc79.png)
this war of mine is gold, Jerry gold even.
this war of mine is gold, Jerry gold even.
I want to limit the amount of benefit they can reap.
Disney would find a way to dig up walt and reanimate him.
the argument is that the people, and the political system the people put in place enabled the company to create and benefit off its creations.
“we live in a society” but unironically.
I. DECLARE. BANKRUPTCY.!
ues, euphoria was used in gta4 and Jedi unleashed
deleted by creator
what is coming for me exactly?
ventrilo: am I a joke to you
no one is moral panicking over ai. people just want control over their creation, whether it’s profit sharing or not being used to train models.
you really can’t see how an imageboard has completely different considerations over image generating models?
or that people are going after ai because there is only like a couple of models that everyone uses vs uncountable image hosts?
both danbooru and stable diffusion could violate copyright, not one or the other.
why would someone want training models to ingest their creation just to spit out free forgeries that they cannot claim the copyright to?
USA didn’t start building bullshit suburbs until 1950s. before that it was dense cities.
this is a super-reach, why don’t we deal with AI indistinguishable from human when it happens.
right now what we have is a language model that is very distinguishable from human so it doesn’t get any human considerations.
if a monkey or chicken created an artwork, it doesn’t have copyrights, because it’s not human either.
LLM are not human, the process to train LLM is not human-like, LLM don’t have human needs or desires, or rights for that matter.
comparing it to humans has been a flawed analogy since day 1.
Ireland’s top players abstained