aka freamon

Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/freamon?tab=activity

Anything from https://lemmon.website is me too.

  • 3 Posts
  • 78 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 27th, 2024

help-circle
  • Oh, right. I was confused by this before, but I understand it now after reading yours and Otters answers, and seeing https://rss.ponder.cat/c/medicine@lemmy.ca - the bot posts to its local version of a remote community, and it federates out like it it normally does.

    Am I right in assuming that - API wise - the bot only interacts with ponder.cat, and doesn’t make calls to the remote instance? (I’m wondering if there’s any barriers to it operating with communities that aren’t on a Lemmy instance).

    Does the bot resolve the human first, check what they moderate, and then resolve the community if they moderate it, or just always resolve the community, and then compare its moderators with who made the request? If its the latter, this could be a way for bad actors to crowbar a community onto your instance (assuming it doesn’t purge it if things don’t match up, of course).

    What would have happened if Otter had sent /add https://lemmy.ca/feeds/c/medicine.xml medicine@lemmy.ca ? Would this be like that time when someone put ‘google’ into google.com, and the Internet blew up?

    Thanks.



  • No, it’s programming.dev being on the blink (or behind in processing incoming activities). You can see by comparing the post at: https://lemmy.world/post/20496937 (made by a programming.dev user) with it’s own copy here: https://programming.dev/post/20191915 - your UI might be too clever for it’s own good and make looking at those posts on their own instances difficult, but the difference is that there’s no comments or votes on programming.dev, but there is on lemmy.world (and other instances which have their own copy of that post).

    If you were banned, it would show your profile with a ‘banned’ sticker. The error message is because it hasn’t heard of you at all, and isn’t going to resolve you because you’re not a logged-in local user.






  • PieFed has some design principles, including being accessible on lower-end devices and for those with unreliable bandwidth, which mean that it’s default UI is never going to look like apps which involve downloading a sizable chunk of Typescript.

    I’m okay with its look. Partly because it’s themeable, and there’s a theme called ‘Card Shadow’ which looks more modern imo. And partly because Lemmy can feel quite slow showing 20 posts at a time, whereas PieFed throws 100 at a time. And also because there will eventually be an API, allowing people to view it how they want (similar to Lemmy - lemmy-ui is maybe not that great, but there’s other frontends which I think are an improvement)







  • is it in reality not “all” but only “all posts that at least one user of this instance is subscribed to”?

    Exactly this, yes. Not literally ‘all’ (a brand new instance would have nothing in its All feed). This is what was meant by ‘partial data set’ - everything for a subscribed community (from the moment it was subscribed to), but nothing for a community that no-one’s subscribed to.

    Some instances run bots to populated their All feed more than what would happen naturally (with the idea being that the bot unsubscribes when a human does)




  • Andrew@piefed.socialtoVideos@lemmy.worldPalestine
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    This is from ‘Shaun’ btw, who I mostly associate with videos criticising JK Rowling and her controversial friends.

    It’s worth the watch, imo (though I can’t claim to be massively informed about the subject, so I have nothing to refute what he is saying). From what I remember, the gist of the video is that Israel is colonial power in a post-colonial world.





  • Oh, well, that’s put me off Alien: Romulus a bit, to be honest. I kind of hate these call-backs, especially when there’s no sophistication to them (I can forgive the “I’ve got a bad feeling …” in Rogue One, but am utterly bored of hearing it in other Star Wars output).

    The ominous side to all this, is that when films become entirely about referencing themselves, they stop being about anything else. Sci-fi works best when there’s an analogy for something that exists in our lives, and offers an opinion on that matter. For example, Lucas has argued that the Ewoks in RotJ represented the Viet Cong, which is a bit clumsy, but it’s better than the sequels, that only seek to represent earlier iterations of Star Wars.


  • The experience from Brazil suggests that the viable ‘post-twitter’ is BlueSky. So one corporate-controlled platform that starts out okay and gets steadily worse is replaced by another, and the cycle continues.

    I don’t think there is a viable ‘post-reddit’ unfortunately , because they built up their userbase at a time when people would actually want to use a link aggregator, before the experience of clicking any external links became fraught and exhausting. So now reddit has the userbase, and they have the means to host images and videos internally, and none of the bots or the lack of API or the general weirdness of the place is enough to get people to leave. Potential competitors assume that they should offer an alternative link aggregator, whereas really the only competitor is something that could magically offer a comparable userbase size.