@Adrius@ttrpg.network There are none so blind as those that will not see. I’m no shill but dogma over evidence is for fools. I’m anitwar.

@donkeyass@lemmy.sdf.org

How Ukraine started the war, maybe. Perhaps practicing some reading of links that are informative on geopolitics and not the usual propaganda from Globalists.

@eatCasserole@lemmy.world

Regardless (if you read the story) it would be realized that SHE never blocked him on 𝕏, which is the 1st response any reasonable person would do. So, IMHO it was a setup by a litigious zealot, who is Zionist. Zionism isn’t pretty.

@HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works @Adrius@ttrpg.network

@shoulderoforion@fedia.io

Why don’t you tell us how you really feel! LMAO, Brilliant thinker aren’t you …

@Adrius@ttrpg.network Nothing wrong about opposing Canada’s support for Ukraine. Actually, quite a positive point, unless you believe in supporting an extreme Right-Wing Dictatorship. Thanks for bringing that up!

@Sunshine@lemmy.ca When are they going to question some anglo-saxon MPs who are CIA? Anyone who thinks the CIA isn’t in Canada is naive. They control OUR foreign policy. Notice how none of our elections ever talk about our foreign policy?

@misk@sopuli.xyz

Sure, good point

@legolas@fedit.pl

@legolas@fedit.pl Very reasonable proposal, but, I think the controversial posts not showing votes, should be the default for all posts. There’s a lot of brigading, especially in some Lemmy groups.

And then what they did to Telegram. One can’t trust that platform anymore, since the spooks have been given the keys to the kingdom.

LMAO sure.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

That’s correct, and they’re the active brigades available. I’m a soldier, it takes months to have troops ready for combat, at a minimum 6 months of training. Just because one has a relatively large military means squat. What counts is how many can go to war immediately.

Why would Russia want to invade? If NATO stays out of adjoining countries they won’t need to. Imagine if Russia or the Chinese put troops in Mexico or Canada, what do you think the US would do? Get a damn clue, you’re extremely naive.

I don’t agree with that number.

EU Combat Troop Numbers The European Union has established EU Battlegroups, which consist of battalion-sized forces reinforced with combat support elements, typically comprising 1,500 troops each. As of 2023, eighteen battlegroups were operational, with two being ready for deployment at any given time. Additionally, a permanent European Union Rapid Deployment Capacity (EU RDC) consisting of up to 5,000 troops (the size of a brigade) is to be operational by 2025. These forces are under the direct control of the Council of the European Union. 🌐 en.wikipedia.org Defence forces of the European Union - Wikipedia 🌐 en.wikipedia.org EU Battlegroup - Wikipedia 🌐 boell.de The never-ending debate of the European Army and why it is unhelpful | Heinrich Böll Stiftung 🌐 en.wikipedia.org United States military deployments - Wikipedia 🌐 en.wikipedia.org European army - Wikipedia 🌐 eeas.europa.eu EU Battlegroups |

OK, do you math at any one time 2 battlegroups are ready to go, that’s 27,000 and not all combat troops. LOL

I’m not moving the goalposts. I forget that I’m talking to civilians. It takes more soldiers in the rear to support soldiers in the front. So the % of combat troops is the tip of the spear. The total number of troops means little, it’s the number of troops that are the tip of the spear. The EU has little in combat capacity, and most of the equipment has been destroyed in Ukraine. So what are they going to fight with?

Son/kid That’s not all combat troops. I’m referring to boots on the ground, combat troops. How many rear soldiers do you think it takes to support 100 k soldiers? I bet you have no Fricken clue … Look deeper.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod