Annoying. Don’t let the industry autoregulate, it’s always lukewarm and ineffective.
Legislate. Ban underage gambling.
This is not a complicated issue, at all, the only barriers are lobbying and corruption.
Annoying. Don’t let the industry autoregulate, it’s always lukewarm and ineffective.
Legislate. Ban underage gambling.
This is not a complicated issue, at all, the only barriers are lobbying and corruption.
``Trees work well, are beautiful and require little maintenance, do that.
Intellectual property is intellectual theft.
Very skeptical of that one.
They’ve been trying to target amyloid for more than a decade, and it’s the first time I hear of it actually working.
The treatment seem to have huge side effects (brain bleeding and swelling) and lead to patient death during the study.
Elly Lilly is also know for marketing zyprexa as a treatment for dementia (despite inefficacy and increased risk of death). Which is IMO criminal, at best unethical. I’m not inclined to trust them at all.
I hope I’m wrong and it works. Alzheimer is a terrible way to go.
Don’t screen shot then, post the text. Or a txt. I think that conversation should be interesting.
High quality sarcasm.
Unethical does not even begin to cut it. It’s firmly in horrifying territory for me.
If a construction company taxidermied their dead workers into animatronics and used those unholy puppets to perform the same job, it wouldn’t shock me more.
Alternatively, the fall of Elon Musk was his way of getting Jack Ma’d, because money is not everything, and you can’t just buy yourself a tool of strategic value and expect no consequences.
I don’t see a scenario where google or the likes would be allowed to fail. So moot point.
Hypothetically it would open a window for open source services to sneak in.
Middle term? The phasing out of personal computers, and moving toward a system of servers/terminals where noone owns software.
You’ll rent computing power or storage space, you’ll only pay for the interface.
AI fear is going to be the trojan horse for even harsher and stupider ‘intellectual property’ laws.
A few things. How do we know it’s going to be Pegasus? How do you know the price, why is it so expensive (and why would anyone assume it to stay so)?
Because if it actually is Pegasus, the main problem with this bill isn’t surveillance (although it is most definitely a problem),
but the tacit endorsement of this unregulated infoweapon.
As the poet said: doubleplusungood.
This isn’t going to be regularly used.
(눈‸눈)
Isn’t the whole point of AI decision making to provide plausible deniability for these sort of things?
Social media is a tool of state surveillance and manipulation. Why wouldn’t it be legal?
https://gdpr.eu/right-to-erasure-request-form/
It’s cumbersome and annoying, but they’ll have to honor it.
It’s not just a theory. Anyone who’ve seen internet before 2015 knows the difference.
An unforeseeable and unfortunate side effect of humans interacting daily with bots masquerading as humans is that we mimic them.
And that we lose our ability to see humanity in others. Being flooded with machines who cannot understand or be touched, influenced, which whom we cannot empathize changed the way we see our fellow humans.
I don’t think there’s any coming back from that. Hopefully there’s a way forward, now that AI’s aren’t a big secret anymore.
Tried mealworm, crickets and a few others.
Pretty terrible tastewise imo, not worth it past the novelty stage.
I don’t really see the point honestly, I’d rather we stabilize our population rather than find ways to accommodate exponential growth a bit longer. We’re hitting that wall eventually.
Creating a positive mental landscape, based on action, something to strive for, rather than visions of impeding doom., is an essential first step.