![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Putin’s Russia also hosted Olympics
Was machen Sachen?
Putin’s Russia also hosted Olympics
should sell products at a loss just to get it everywhere.
Why to a loss? They should just sell it everywhere.
Yes, it was great back then. I really enjoyed using it until they switched over to Fandom. So glad they got rid of it again.
Touching up your photograph or painting does not make it mine.
if you buy a fairphone maybe you do not buy new devices every year
only micro usb and very slow charging bricks in there
I am not a lawyer but the first question is probably a yes. AI is software and software does and can not hold any rights by itself as of today. The second question is what this post is about and the judge in the article said no, a human or company does not hold copyright over something AI creates. That does not mean, that anything touched by or created with the use of AI is not copyrightable. If you have your movie script error checked or rephrased with an AI tool it’s still your movie script with your orignal ideas in it.
You don’t “copyright something”. You have a copyright on everything you create yourself by default and you don’t on things that are not copyrightable. You can not put a copyright on something not copyrightable.
In practice this means if someone else copies your script without your consent, you can then try to enforce your exclusive copyright by suing them for copyright infringement. Then you need to proof and convince the judge of the originality of the work and that you put in significant creative effort.
we let the AI draw it for us
And still the list of ingredients and food preparation process will not be copyrighted, just the way the specific recipe is written. Anyone could write a simple rephrased version of that recipe which creates the same dish and sell it. Or sell the dish in their restaurant.
other humans perhabs
artist’s or ai generated?
Not having your tweets displayed publicly is not blocking. It’s just about which public tweets you are shown.
Usually they are having them distributed my mosque communities to interested passer-bys in the streets of cities for free.
Of course you can get one. They are probably planning to distribute them for free in the streets.
Thank you for clarification! Of course I meant the TOR browser client itself, should have been more precise.
Yep, and thats nothing the average user has any interest in.
It’s a web browser. Slower than others and some pages won’t work but other than that, it does just that.
Love how only his backpack touches the rock.