Buy a keyboard and monitor

“Discord said users will be able to turn off the ads in their settings.”

If they ask the SAME question and you score still goes DOWN I’m gonna go ahead and call that “a bad sign”.

Oddsparks

Dyson Sphere Program

Some games don’t even have fucking KEYBINDS, which the most basic of accessibility features.

This will only change when stores (like Steam) start cataloguing these types of features and letting people setup default filters to hide all games without them.

The users have to make them hear that releasing any game without basic accessibility options is unacceptable. This will only happen when the majority is pushing for it, not just those that need the options.

Until then, make sure you leave a negative review and get a refund when you see this kind of thing, even if the game is otherwise good. Pirate the game instead if you still want to play it anyway. They have to be told that this is unacceptable.

Vanillaware in a nutshell

No, it’s not in Vivaldi

Vivaldi doesn’t (and won’t) have it.

And as soon as they have any competitors we might consider it

Of course they can. Everyone knows that password managers exist.

The driver is always responsible for using the tools within the car correctly and maintaining control of the vehicle at all times.

Either way the driver would be at fault. However, the driver might be able to make a (completely separate) case that the car’s defects made control impossible, but since the driver always had the option to disable self-driving, I doubt that would go anywhere.

Just like you don’t get off the hook if your cruise control causes an accident… and it doesn’t matter how much Tesla lied about what it may or may not be capable of, because at the end of the day it’s always the driver’s responsibility to know the limitations of the vehicle and disable the feature and take control when necessary.

Or just get the old booster now and then by the time they release the update you’ll be ready for your next booster anyway…

Except the fediverse is highly resilient in this regard, since all of the data is replicated. If an instance goes down, all of that instance’s posts are still available on every other instance.

That is LITERALLY the meaning of the “Luddite” position that has been disclaimed.

I’ve heard that enabling CloudFlare DDoS protection on Lemmy breaks federation due to the amount of ActivityPub traffic.

I don’t think it was ever turned off, it just requires the subscription to access GPT-4 and then enabling the plugins.

It was a closed beta before, but it’s been available to everybody for a while now.

There was also the version with Bing integration that they removed, which might be what you’re thinking of… but there are 100’s of other web search plugins available beyond Bing.

Except WEI is going to make it so the website can detect and block you if you don’t allow the ads, regardless of your browser and extensions

ChatGPT can also search the internet

Sounds like the heuristic is taking multiple samples only uses them if they are within some consistency threshold, to hedge against the cases where the field has random data.

The reason it only fails rarely and randomly is because it only happens when multiple actually random timestamps happen to line up around the same time.

Sort of like how several applications (cough git cough) have failure modes when two different files happen to have the same hash.

Turns out developers are bad at statistics and probabilities and don’t understand the birthday paradox.

Except this article is completely incorrect and doesn’t even acknowledge the actual ruling responsible for this popular belief:

In 1919 the primacy of shareholder value maximization was affirmed in a ruling by the Michigan State Supreme Court in Dodge vs. Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford wanted to invest Ford Motor Company’s considerable retained earnings in the company rather than distribute it to shareholders. The Dodge brothers, minority shareholders in Ford Motor Company, brought suit against Ford, alleging that his intention to benefit employees and consumers was at the expense of shareholders. In their ruling, the Michigan court agreed with the Dodge brothers: