Missing article was here It didn’t contain much other than dates it was filed and plaintiffs information. Which is a standard practice anywhere.

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages.[14][15][16] At the time of the suit’s filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had, “been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions”. The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing, “false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency’s reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill”.[17][14][18][19]

The article is still up, Wikipedia calling ANI biased, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_News_International

So not really sure, why the massive outrage. Removing intricate details from ongoing lawsuits is standard practice.

While the lawsuit by ANI demands that editors who made the edit claiming ANI as govt mouth piece be identified, Wikipedia hasn’t done it yet and the article is right about setting a dangerous precedent if high court forces Wikipedia to reveal the names. But at the same time article is biased and has misleading information such as > In an unprecedented move, Wikipedia removed the page from its platform on October 21.>

You can see some well noted examples of articles being removed before from Wikipedia here . So there is clearly precedent for removal of articles. I used love vox a decade ago, but now I see these half truths/partial stories are a commonplace and I’m happy to have ditched vox now.

It’s a gorgeous, breathtaking game.

Fence, Fuck fuck FUCCCCK!!!

I think they would, since once UK joins any other state considering leaving can just be shown UK’s example if she had joined EU, it could be said it was with tail between her legs.

I don’t know why these days people just forget CIA funding extremism in Pakistan.

Tankies

But who am I to judge?

I think that’s brilliant

Idk about bandaid, but my glove has small metal mesh that makes it touch compatible.

Also mics that are recording are super easy to sweep even incompetent intelligence operations will find them because all you need is a beep wand type apparatus that can check for electric signals where there shouldn’t be any, bombs however are a lot harder to find because that would require having well trained dogs on multiple types of exploaives that don’t do anything other than just sniffing explosives. These dogs take years of discipline that requires competence by definition.

Probably more like, scamming centers are mostly focused on foreigners (from Indian pov), so that’s ok.

I chuckled

This has to be one of the most specific memes that I have had the honor of sharing with that one specific group of friends.

I think that should be correct, but again English is not my first language.

Funny meme.

What is this headline, it’s either Washington to Kyiv Or it is USA to Ukraine, why US to Kyiv?

Or if it’s Celsius, bring God.

So what has everyone moved on to?

It was “not a mistake” for army leadership to not having a contact with the dude.

Well i chuckled

It’s not Palestine. No one cares /s

To be honest it always bothers me that civil wars have been raging in one or the other African country throughout last century, genocide, ethno-state, famine etc have been raging almost all the time.

It’s never been interesting enough for most media in east or in the west. Heck even some media in Africa doesn’t care either. Some human rights groups care, but their funding is limited, and no one questions who is supplying weapons to African genocide propogators and I used to think it’s all Russian or Russian copied Chinese weapons, but last year when I was looking at things in depth, they also have NATO weapons, but I couldn’t find how they got it.

IT’S BBC.