![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
What are folks doing in those cases? Where I live you can’t get a mortgage if you don’t have proof of insurance and until your loan to value in hits a certain amount the bank basically manages the policy.
What are folks doing in those cases? Where I live you can’t get a mortgage if you don’t have proof of insurance and until your loan to value in hits a certain amount the bank basically manages the policy.
It’s huge. With a large family (or given recent inflation of pricings for eating out a small family) you can stay for an extra day or two with the savings from cooking some meals at your accomodations.
This is exactly the appeal of an Airbnb for me. Solo traveling a hotel is adequate, bit with a family having the extra space and kitchen is a game changer. Not to mention the individual charm of staying in a unique spot vs staying on a corporate decorated to the lowest common denominator hotel room.
This is something I consistently see overlooked in these discussions. I don’t dispute that it increases prices for locals and there needs to be some balance, but hotels are not offering anything close to Airbnb’s for a large section of travelers.
Math checks out, but something still seems off…
Thanks! I agree some of what’s needed are more lurkers to vote up the little content that is posted, to get more folks posting.
I’m in, but mostly a lurker.
That’s no worse than you started. The fact remains nobody is going to get 100% coverage of their contact list on the fediverse without Meta, so trading a Facebook account for a threads account is no different, and it ignores the benefits of that time when you maybe able to live without either.
I think the issue is that on mobile especially, switching contexts between apps is incredibly difficult compared to desktop and as such it’s easier for one app maker to include everything so it can contest switch more easily. The “share” mechanisms on Android and iOS are great for the common use cases but harder for more nuanced things.
That and keeping you within their ecosystem drives engagement which increases profit.
That’s terrible advice.
Ew. Sounds gross, so it probably isn’t far off.
That sounds like a feature to me. Gotta pay extra for that offline start capability. And if you don’t designate this far as your offline remote start car before hand you’re fucked.
I don’t disagree, regional high speed is where it’s gotta start.
The problem today is that it’s an order of magnitude longer. Chicago to LA by airplane is 4 hours. Chicago to LA via Amtrak is about 56 hours. I don’t know that high speed rail is going to fix that problem, sure it might get it down some, but even a 24 hour train is six times longer than flying.
I say this as someone that takes Amtrak at every opportunity because I enjoy trains and want to see them become viable for more people.
That’s basically the way interurban trains operated for years before the highway system and personal vehicles replaced that mode of transport. It wasn’t solar powered back then, but the idea makes a lot of sense.
Which are all useless if nobody you want to talk to is there.
Arguably, if you’re compressing the signal wirelessly via Bluetooth, the ceiling for quality is probably in that low couple hundred bucks market. Apple probes people will overpay for something but anything actually better is probably going to be wired.
Mind blown. I’ve observed this and it’s fucking infuriating, only to just realize they’re judging me for doing it too quickly and making me try again.
Me too, and I’m not even a fan of meta to begin with, but paying to link to another site is a pure violation of the way the Internet was supposed to work.
Yeah. I understand this, my question was about what happens when no insurance company wants to insure the property?