![](https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/yFKDkvERh0.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
And what will that accomplish? The Kim family are horrible leaders, but this comment is unhinged. Torture will not undo anything they’ve done.
That’s not really how it works. It would only make them look stupid if they did that, and increase the risk of being voted out in the next election. Because of the filibuster, legislation generally needs 60 votes in the Senate before it goes to the president. Democrats have 51 seats, with two frequent defectors. Imagine if Biden’s record going into 2024 is that he vetoed every single piece of legislation.
Democrats have a slim majority in the senate, which is not enough to get whatever they want done without compromising, especially considering that two senators are not as left wing as the rest of the party.
As far as war and military spending goes, I agree that the party could do better.
First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist
“they” in this poem is referring to anti-semites, specifically Nazis. Germany is doing the right thing by censoring and excluding anti-semites from society, to ensure that what this poem describes will never happen again.
As a trans person, I feel far safer on Lemmy and mastodon than I ever did on any other social media.
I’m not saying it necessarily should be that way, but that’s just how the word has been used historically and in the present. Antisemitism has been different from other forms of racism because it is hatred that is often based on conspiracy theories about Jews. Discrimination against Arabs would usually fall under islamophobia (even though not all Arabs are Muslim), or other words like anti-arabism or anti-arab sentiment.
Antisemitism refers to discrimination against Jews, not any semitic people. Also, there aren’t any Arabs mentioned in the article.
censor channels that go against globalism
Such as…?
Yes, if advertisers start pulling out then I could see something changing. But advertisers are unlikely to do that unless they stop making money from it as well. So a campaign like that sounds like a good idea but also will be very difficult to succeed
They could pay more staff to moderate, or use their fancy AI that they like so much.
You might think it is unethical to silence different opinions which is a valid position. But on the other hand I see it as unethical to host dangerous misinformation and hateful content.
YouTube is essentially a monopoly and there isn’t any realistic alternative for most people, so it’s not like they have to worry about backlash so much. That’s a whole 'nother issue though
Google/YouTube doesn’t care. If they can put ads on it and make money they will leave it up.
They will run ads for whoever pays them including hate groups like the Heritage Foundation
How is allowing the death of school children a solution to climate change? Do you believe that they will all grow up to be Fossil Fuel Executives?
“Socialism” in the form of government regulations and healthcare is popular. Not so much Marxism or proleterian revolution
It is more than just cruel. It is abusive and genocidal. LGBT youth will die because of this law and the countless others being passed in certain states.
I agree, but also I don’t see the harm in reporting on how corporations using AI is hurting artists or writers.
When a company does something controversial, it becomes news.
People care because it means that Niantic did not pay an artist to create the image.
Piracychads keep winning
The far right actually holds political power in the US while the far left does not.