Knowing this it seems like a very low quality study. They should probably redo this with multiple conditions.
- Base Llama 3
- Tuned Llama 3
- Untrained human summarizer
- trained/professional human summarizer
Knowing this it seems like a very low quality study. They should probably redo this with multiple conditions.
If you make enough mistakes, speed is a detriment not a benefit. Increasing speed allows you to produce more summaries but if you still need to correct and edit them all you’ve done is add a step where a human has to still read the document to the level where they could summarize it and edit the AI summary. Therefore the bottleneck of a human reading the document and working on a summary is still there. It would only potentially make it slightly easier if the corrections needed are small and obvious.
Didn’t know about that one, thanks!
The site Semantic Scholar and Perplexity AI do a good job of using ML to help with that but the problem with scientific publishing is fundamental to it’s business model which needs to be uprooted to make modern science feasible
Which is kind of what the point is. Start it without a habit, form a habit of playing that makes you want to do the action of exercise
Yeah I really find that 0 is now the definitive series entry. Everything kind of only works if you start with 0 and do Kiwami now. It’s also a much tighter and satisfying character progression for all involved.
16 years for me, I feel you man
In what world is it acceptable military doctrine to kill the entire family of enemy combatants? If that was the case with Israeli soldiers you’d be able to extrapolate a justifiable strike to include almost the entire population as almost all citizens have done military service. Take a minute to actually soak in what you just said.