• 2 Posts
  • 56 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2024

help-circle

  • The last generation has been a total mess for both Intel and AMD.

    AMD had motherboards frying CPUs, crazy stupid post issues due to DDR5 memory training (and my personal build fails to post like 25% of the time due to this exact same stupid shit), and just generally less than a totally reliable experience compared to previous gens.

    Intel has much the same set of problems on their 13/14th gen stuff: dead chips, memory training issues, instability.

    Wonder if it’s just a fluke that both x86 vendors are having a shitty generation at the same time, or if something else is at play.


  • Here’s some useless retro crap: the 8" disks almost certainly cost more.

    There was absolutely a reliability scale as you moved down the physical disk size: the 8 inch disks were more reliable than the 5.25, which were more reliable than the 3.5, due in large part to the market was requiring them to get cheaper as the drive tech matured, and thus you ended up with cheaper, less reliable media as you went along through the evolution.

    40 years later, 8" disks nearly all read, 5.25" disks mostly all read, and 3.5" disks are an absolute crapshoot: I find that less than half of the ones I come across are still actually accessible, compared to about 90% of the 5.25" and 8" ones.

    That experience of course has some personal bias, but that’s a story that holds pretty true talking to anyone who tries to archive old floppies, so it’s probably reasonable enough to use for actual data.

    So, if you wanted the most reliable option, and since the military probably doesn’t care what it costs, you’d pick a 8" disk.







  • I’m going to argue that, yeah, probably, but it depends.

    Are you at risk of just losing your personal data, or is this hosting services other people upload shit to?

    If you’ve got other people’s photos or documents or passwords or whatever, then no. You need more than one backup, you need to automate testing of your backups, and you need to make damn sure that you can absolutely recover from BOTH sets of backups.

    If it’s just your shit, then you do what you’re comfortable with: if you lost your home server and it’s backups, then are you okay with that outcome?

    If that’s a ‘no’, then you need more than the one backup, and testing, and automation blah blah blah.

    I have the live server data, archives on a different drive in the system, and archives uploaded to the cloud.

    About once a week or so I burn the local backup files to a BD-R, chuck that in a media-rated fire safe (an aside: a paper-rated fire safe is not sufficient for plastic disks, so make sure you buy one that actually will keep your backups from being melted otherwise, meh, you didn’t really do anything).

    The cloud versions are on a provider that claims 99.99999% durability, which is good enough, and I keep 60 days of backups in the cloud so that I have enough versions to rotate back through.

    I also built a 2nd little baby server that’ll grab the backups and do an automated restore and stand up my entire stack once a month, just to verify that the backup archives are actually backups and actually can be downloaded, unarchived, and automatically bring up all the stacks and populate the databases and have everything just appear up and running.