Somebody actually did make this as a joke years ago haha https://github.com/yarrick/pingfs
Somebody actually did make this as a joke years ago haha https://github.com/yarrick/pingfs
Thanks for reading and pointing out that typo! (I fixed it)
Jortage is a really interesting approach. It definitely helps reduce the impact of the file hosting problem but it doesn’t fully address the underlying cost issue. The cost of storing files grows every month indefinitely while donations typically don’t.
I would like to see a file hosting pool come to lemmy though. So I will look into it. :)
Credit scores didn’t exist but credit bureaus date back to the mid 1800s in the USA. Also, as others have mentioned creditors would do their due diligence and try to assert that you would be able to pay back your loans by doing many of the same things they do now.
This really isn’t some new, crazy concept like you’re making it out to be. The score has only simplified the process.
uh… that’s exactly how it worked. The Wikipedia page you linked mentions credit bureaus. If you go to that page you can see they were established in the USA by the mid 1800s. Yes, it was all done on paper. That’s how the world used to work.
No… that’s the decision of company who doesn’t want to invest in a new platform. They’d rather disable the app than support the users there.
That’s my point. If they believe the hardware will be successful they would want to release apps for it that give them the ability to capture and retain customers. As it stands Apple headset users can only really consume Apple content. So it’s much more likely they just don’t believe in the product not that they’re scared.
Your argument doesn’t make any sense. Spotify isn’t going to produce an AR headset and really doubt Netflix will either. It makes more sense for them to release apps for the device if they think it’s going to be successful.
Uh what? In what way would Spotify and Netflix be scared of this disruption?
Those “updates” are pitiful. As far as I understand the vast majority of update content is still being supplied by the community. The game is still flooded by hackers with no word on when that will be addressed if ever.
Is it right to push more gambling based micro transactions in a game that lacks actual support?
If this were any other company people would be raging
If they don’t want to support it that’s fine but they should stop releasing new micro transactions then
Omg starfield??? That game is diarrhea dookie!
Indeed. Like many career stories from back then it sounds kinda lovely.
Lol he was nothing more than middle class. He also was telling the story from the perspective of “I understand how easy it was for me”. He was a really cool guy.
I remember talking to an older fella about his experience becoming a programmer back in the 60s (I think). He told me that he decided it was time to start a career so he went to a nearby IBM office and asked for a job. They gave him an aptitude test and then hired him the same day. He wrote code for their mainframes until he retired.
I enjoyed it up until the ending. Good experience overall though.
That’s not really what the article says but ok. I like that you immediately assume I don’t know what an IQ test is lol.
Yeah, I wish it could be cheaper but I’m not a corporation. Instead I’m dependent on them to make a simpler product.
The target audience is certainly not developers because they can jump through the hoops to setup their own S3 + CDN or similar.