Security cameras and baby monitors are basically glorified webcams with cloud storage.

Sounds just like the sounds newer trucks make when they back up: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A3Wt1_51EVA

Breakfast: half a yogurt cup, handful of cereal (leftovers from toddler), potato chips crumbs at the bottom of the bag (leftover from DnD last night), one banana.

Lunch: dozen Skittles, omelette with bacon and veggies.

These sets of concentric shells contain a thin layer of positive mass tucked inside an outer layer of negative mass.

So how much evidence is there for negative mass, then? Sounds like just replacing one unknown with another.

It would be kind of nostalgic. Like the discussion forums of yore, where signatures were the place to shove quotes, statistics, awards, maybe a gif or two.

Agreed, look at all the natural variation that was lost. The newcomers don’t convey the same intensity of emotions.

P.S. “extant” means still in existence, I believe you meant “extinct” :)

Edit: I only now realize the image is also incorrectly labeled. It’s a perfectly understandable mistake, anyway.

This led to an interesting question. Can a being be omnipotent without being omniscient? In other words, maybe I do create reality as I go (hence omnipotent) but I don’t know how I do it nor what things are doing when I’m not looking at them (hence not omniscient)

As with many articles in science and math, the discovery isn’t that “this weird thing happens”, but that “hey, we can model this weird thing using this equation/model (that sometimes comes from a totally unrelated field).” Maybe in 10, 20, 50 years this discovery will become the key to understanding yet another weird thing, and so on.

“Everyone understands” that if you drop an object it falls to the ground. Yet we still don’t fully understand how gravitation works.