First thing I do, too :)

o7

https://github.com/OhMyGuus/I-Still-Dont-Care-About-Cookies

Absolutely. People should stop being so whiney and start liberating instead.

I have 2 more :(

I really do not understand the decision for the frontal display. It adds a huuuge amount of weight and its sole function to show the artificial eyes is mediocre at best, watch MKBHD’s video: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dtp6b76pMak

My first thought, too :)

Yeah, that’s why fractions are good thing.

The Finals Playtest. To be honest it is pretty fun.

With the words of the rust developer: Unity can get fucked

https://garry.net/posts/unity-can-get-fucked

Gameplaywise nice, but from a tech standpoint a little underwhelming. No 32:9 support, HDR is mediocre and without calibration, no FOV settings, language cannot be properly changed,…

She talks about the technical errors she made while performing and he says that it is a difficult piece and that the audience surely had not noticed.

Accurate

No, ‘sleep quality’ was tested, too.

You can use this link and force refresh at the bottom: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1691693740254228741.html

(via https://feddit.de/comment/2218306 )

We know that we’re not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it’s sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing.

Yeah, well, that’s one of the main issues addressed in this video: You are not transparent about this, when you swap out videos without notice or bury corrections in a non-pinned comment.

Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn’t materially change the recommendation.

If the listing is wrong, who guarantees the lab tests on which the conclusion is based on are not wrong?

The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes.

Take the time it needs to produce correct reviews then. Who wants fast but false results?

Edit: Follow up on Linus’ response from GN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3byz3txpso

Followup on Linus’ response from GN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3byz3txpso

Here is his response: https://linustechtips.com/topic/1526180-gamers-nexus-alleges-lmg-has-insufficient-ethics-and-integrity/page/16/?__cf_chl_rt_tk=riEm65zw7EleA5UJEi3eN8ZaHnVo6Smg27vxUlGW5uk-1692115262-0-gaNycGzNDGU#comment-16078641

My take on it:

We know that we’re not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it’s sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing.

Yeah, well, that’s one of the main issues addressed in this video: You are not transparent about this, when you swap out videos without notice or bury corrections in a non-pinned comment.

Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn’t materially change the recommendation.

If the listing is wrong, who guarantees the lab tests on which the conclusion is based on are not wrong?

The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes.

Take the time it needs to produce correct reviews then. Who wants fast but false results?

And it’s foxnews :/

It will be either way