![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Why? Seems like the most fun kind of ovement to me…
Why? Seems like the most fun kind of ovement to me…
Weren’t you just over in another thread saying deep fake porn is a victimless crime?
You’re a bit fucked up, aren’t ya?
Stealing food so you don’t die is different from abusing women because you’re sad. What a creepy comparison.
Lots of people are left out of society, that’s no excuse for violent hatred. There are plenty of men who don’t turn into disgusting abusive trolls; the ones who do don’t get a pass because life is hard.
It’s obscene to suggest that they don’t have a choice or bear responsibility for their actions. It insults and directly harms both them and their victims.
Fucking yikes, freak.
I think varmints are necessarily li’l, not little.
That happens on the reg since he went to that all meat diet or whatever
Joke’s on Brussels - 6% of a negative number is not a disincentive.
Should be 6% of his personal net worth as most optimistically reported.
New display at the museum: Vandal in Carbonite; mixed media, 2023
They tasty tho.
Sincerely, Snow leopards
Outside
Nothing spurs innovation like workers getting a contract that allows them to not starve.
Alternate summary: “Disney creates a task force to explore AI in direct response to their VFX workers’ gaining representation, because fuck all workers.”
I clicked the link and my phone got immediate cancer. If this is for info instead of just you pushing some affiliate linking scam, post the text so we can actually engage. Otherwise be a better person and gtfo
Brb setting up a semiconductor factory. NBD
Variations below 10 microns, like the car parts?
Can I ask a question that may sound snarky and snobby over internet text, but I’m genuinely and non-judgmentally curious about?
Where did this use of “aesthetic” come from? From context it appears to mean something different in your sentence (good “look” or style that is on trend and I like) than I understood it to mean (“look” or style referring to an encompassing cohesion instead of a qualitative assessment).
This language enthusiast is curious. Language changes and that’s cool, but this seems to confuse the term rather than disambiguate. Can you explain what you mean by it, and do you remember where you learned to use the word that way? Is it a regionalism?
Legit no but apparently I’m the only one.
Please let us know who is currently forcing you to choose between those two options and I promise we’ll be appropriately outraged.