Infamous implies somebody is famous in a negative way. If anything, Gabe is a shining example that should be upheld.
Infamous implies somebody is famous in a negative way. If anything, Gabe is a shining example that should be upheld.
Why would we discuss changing the law, rather than ensuring that it is applied indiscriminately? ANY law and punishment can be used to discriminate, and many are. By your logic if the police started prosecuting murderers in a biased manner, we should remove the law against murder.
Seems like I’m being attacked for something I didn’t say. My statement was purely a very minor thing, about how the issue is enforcement, not the actual law. And I certainly did not imply anything with it, but it seems a lot is being read into those few words that were not at all intended
? The law has been around a century, current controversy is that it’s not being applied equally
What about my statement is brutal? It’s not the law at fault, the law is impartial about all religious symbols. The problem is the lack of equal enforcement. Which is essentially what you’re saying in different words
That’s a problem with enforcement, not the law.
Shame it’s only THEIR children they give a damn about
Just wait till it pukes up a lightsaber at you
Hope she’s doing well, shame what the CCP did to her
Just don’t do it in the landfills, then? Ethylene glycol is a chemical with practical uses, there’s no reason not to collect it in a recycling facility.
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good.
Lots of things are toxic, we can deal with them in industrial settings just fine. Pretty much everything we use is toxic at some point in its manufacturing process
Not sure whether you got it on sale, or how many DLC you actually got, but it currently costs $380 for the complete package.
Farmers have to rely on adding mined potash to the soils to compensate for that loss.
You mean this sentence in the comment you replied to? This sentence that claims potassium cannot be replaced?
300 USD… a ‘little’ pricey
You did read the article, or at least the summary, right? It’s discussing shortage of fertiliser due to supply issues
How would crop rotation replenish a physical element that can’t be pulled out of the air, though?
Assuming they were wearing a space suit, probably nothing very different from ordinary decomposition except the lack of insects
What’s happening to RPS? I’ve been seeing more and more articles from them about games the writer has never played, with no useful information. Like this one, basically copy and paste of the patch notes and a summary of steam reviews. Used to like them for in depth game reviews, guess that’s going the way of the dodo.
I would make the argument that wishing people would hurry up and die of old age is not actually advocating violence per se
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Would you rather things stayed as they were?