As soon as Apple announced its plans to inject generative AI into the iPhone, it was as good as official: The technology is now all but unavoidable. Large language models will soon lurk on most of the world’s smartphones, generating images and text in messaging and email apps. AI has already colonized web search, appearing in Google and Bing. OpenAI, the $80 billion start-up that has partnered with Apple and Microsoft, feels ubiquitous; the auto-generated products of its ChatGPTs and DALL-Es are everywhere. And for a growing number of consumers, that’s a problem.

Rarely has a technology risen—or been forced—into prominence amid such controversy and consumer anxiety. Certainly, some Americans are excited about AI, though a majority said in a recent survey, for instance, that they are concerned AI will increase unemployment; in another, three out of four said they believe it will be abused to interfere with the upcoming presidential election. And many AI products have failed to impress. The launch of Google’s “AI Overview” was a disaster; the search giant’s new bot cheerfully told users to add glue to pizza and that potentially poisonous mushrooms were safe to eat. Meanwhile, OpenAI has been mired in scandal, incensing former employees with a controversial nondisclosure agreement and allegedly ripping off one of the world’s most famous actors for a voice-assistant product. Thus far, much of the resistance to the spread of AI has come from watchdog groups, concerned citizens, and creators worried about their livelihood. Now a consumer backlash to the technology has begun to unfold as well—so much so that a market has sprung up to capitalize on it.


Obligatory “fuck 99.9999% of all AI use-cases, the people who make them, and the techbros that push them.”

  • QuokkaA
    link
    5
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    That literally tells the story of a people’s losing their livelihood due to capitalist usage of technology, and targeting the technology instead of the systemic issue.

    • Norah - She/They
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1910 days ago

      You say this like destroying the technology wasn’t their way of targeting the systemic issue? Destroying expensive machinery has been used by labour time and again as a tactic to get the capitalist class to cough up.

      • @Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        310 days ago

        So, do textiles machines not exist anymore? It doesnt sound like them burning down factories stopped the textile factories in the long run

    • Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      @Marsupial did you take a moment to read or listen to it? Because you happen to be “literally” incorrect here.

      If your plan is just to parrot your preconception/stereotype (invented and promoted, no less, by the very capitalists Luddites had been opposing) while an actual source – an interview with a guy who *wrote the book* on Luddites – is staring you directly in the face, then I don’t think having any kind of further conversation here makes sense.