Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh look, more elitism posts.

    So you want an alternative to large closed source proprietary platforms, but don’t want to allow anyone who doesn’t use it via a “preapproved” list of providers?

    The level of irony in these posts is astounding.

    • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you don’t give a shit abount Facebook enabling genocide, amplifying white supremacism or, you know, selling milluons of users’ private data to the Kremlin, then sure, why not.

      This isn’t about elitism, this is about a known bad actor threatening to harvest our conversations without our fucking permission, or using Microsoft’s tactic of “embrace and extend” to destroy the competition.

      Anyone can implement ActivityPub. We have no problem with that. Facebook is a corporation whose business strategy has consistently been about harvesting users’ data and selling it to political advertisers.

      • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Why are you only concerned about Facebook doing what you describe?

        It’s weird that this is downvoted. Is Facebook the only villain in this world or something?

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah. Whataboutism … but lacking the courage to even name the other whatabouts. Top-notch disputation that!

          • TheLurker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If I name instances in the ML sphere posting clearly anti western propaganda, hate speech and the questionable impartiality of rule enforcement in the fediverse, are you going to cry foul?

            • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes it is, but it’s not your fault. You can only manage to type a single word at a time before forming a full sentence even.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        All things that exist already in Lemmy.

        And only admins of an instance could artificially prioritise posts on the fediverse, and only on their instance.

        Bots, shills and bad actors exist on all platforms to inflate posts and opinions.

        • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t seem to understand the issue. Facebook IS the bad actor. They’ll allow racists, nazis and all kinds of assholes just as long as they get their sweet advertising money.

          Instance admins moderate according to community rules. Zuck moderates according to what’s most profitable.

          To put it another way, imagine reddit started federating with Lemmy, and suddenly all the users from TheDonald started harassing our political forums. If that sounds bad, remember how many fake accounts ran by shills and foreign states (read: Russia) appeated on Facebook between 2014 and 2017.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        threatening to harvest our conversations without our fucking permission,

        Public posts on social media are well public. There’s literally nothing that stops them from reading your posts without federation, and federation does very little to change that in a meaningful way.

        or using Microsoft’s tactic of “embrace and extend” to destroy the competition

        By what, adding features to Threads that make users prefer it over other ActivityPub implementations? The worst case here is that Meta federates, then does something that breaks federation and their users don’t jump ship to another instance but stick with the Meta product?

        Anyone can implement ActivityPub. We have no problem with that.

        So long as they aren’t a giant corp you personally see as especially evil, then if they implement ActivityPub they need to be blocked as globally as possible?

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        And advocating for open standards while excluding platforms because “big company bad” ideology is naivety.

        • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look at the history of XMPP, to give you a precursor of what to expect. There’s no naivety here. Those who don’t history are doomed to repeat it.

          • TheLurker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh for fuck sake, can you to stop with the “what about XMPP” bullshit please?

            The fucking protocol still exists. And none of you bandwagoning twats use it. But you constantly talk about it like it was stolen from you. In reality you don’t know what it is and use it as a strawman for your arguments.

            Right now, download any number of XMPP clients and start using the protocol.

            You don’t because you are part of the “big is bad” elitism trope. Just a bunch of pathetic wannabe underground elitist.

            • r_se_random@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thanks for making wild assumptions about what I use.

              And also, incorrect usage of the strawman fallacy.

              I hope you have a nice day :)

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It only relates to Threads, exactly becaise they are an enemy of freedom.

      Just as you can’t afford to tolerate intolerance, you shouldn’t give freedom to thos who want to strip it away from you.

      There’s nothing of elitism in that.

      • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Elitism: the advocacy or existence of an elite as a dominating element in a system or society.

        What you just described is exactly how elitism works. I understand the hate for Facebook and all of Meta’s products. However, this is exactly how gate keeping starts. I don’t want to see the fediverse go anywhere more than the next person but it becomes contradicting and hypocritical to the entire establishment of the fediverse if Lemmy or other federated apps begin to decide who can and can’t be federated. That is the whole image right? To prevent gate keeping and to establish that not one person owns any one portion of Lemmy, Mastodon, etc. However, what happens when an entity on Lemmy does start deciding to defederate a Conglomerate starts making decisions just like Facebook? The does Lemmy not start fitting the bill of not being able to tolerate the intolerance as well? To me that becomes elitism the very thing Lemmy users swear is a perfect system.

        I don’t believe Meta is good for anyone or anything but Lemmy users need to understand that you can’t say, “we are different.” And then justifying the very contradiction of being exactly the same by just saying, “Facebook takes freedom.” I don’t like Facebook infact fuck them but either Lemmy users admit they need to play the game like Facebook and that someone controls who is a part of content and who isn’t or they don’t. Just stop trying to find ways that this would be “different” just fucking say, “we want to control the content that is on the platform and who can be a part of it.” Because now you are playing the Meta game on their own terf. Just tired of Lemmy users thinking they are special.

        • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is not means for control seizure; in fact, barely any Lemmy admins can afford to exercise their powers against users, as everyone can effortlessly move to another instance.

          This is a matter of protection, and you can’t fight Meta without it.

          It’s like doing nothing with wolves attacking sheep, because “if you attack wolves, you won’t be that different from them”. No, you would be. We should do it and we have users’ support - and the best admins can do is open a vote, which was conducted on many instances (and had pretty much one outcome: defederate).

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I find it bizarre you think the mere possibility of users from a big corporate service being able to communicate with the fediverse is akin to wolves attacking sheep.

            If you really need your echo chamber to be free of people who use Meta servers, you could just block them as a user without mandating everyone else do so too.

            • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There’s nothing wrong with the people.

              There is a lot wrong with Meta.

              Single-user effort will only get you so far; blocking Threads individually will break user experience (as most interactions, not just posts, will originate from Threads), and embracing Threads will inevitably lead to downturn in Fedi-native communities, further drying what just began to grow.

              I can block content from Threads, but I cannot block the influence Threads exert on fedi. This is why servers need to defederate - to protect and preserve the community from any influence Zuck can singlehandedly exert.

              At the same time, I welcome all Threads users to register on Mastodon and become Fedi natives. This would be the best outcome possible.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “An enemy of freedom”. 🙄

        I mean can you be more cliche?

        Or maybe, out of the 3 Billion active users on Facebook each month, you, and many others, are focused on fucked up shit. Because, shock and horror, everyone is gripped by the propaganda of the group. Welcome to being part of a biological social species.

        Just for a moment consider the following. Facebook priorities posts that get engagement, they don’t care about morality and fairness and they won’t stop untill it is illegal to do so.

        I don’t absolve them of their responsibility, but you attributed malicious intent when stupidity and profit is only needed.

        • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I never implied there’s an evil master plan behind it.

          I implied that when greed prevails, any other consideration, freedom included, get bulldozed. And at that point you can safely assume they are enemy of freedom - they don’t have to promote authoritarianism, it’s enough for them to benefit from a system that strips us from our freedoms, and happily keep operating.

          • TheLurker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, you literally said that Facebook is evil, because you said, with grammatically corrections “Facebook is against freedom”. And don’t try to argue that this is a difference or semantic.

            Facebook doesn’t give a shit about your ideology, it only wants likes because that improves its influence. Be that capitalism’s influence or socialists influence.

            • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nope, I said Facebook is an enemy of freedom. And that doesn’t mean their primary goal is to strip it away, it means the way they operate goes against freedom and they don’t mind it.

              If tomorrow aliens will militarily invade in search for resources, and will entirely disregard any human pain and suffering along the way as they destroy everything and everyone, will they stop being enemies of humanity simply due to the fact they’re not here for genocide per se?

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Totally agree. It’s unfortunate because a lot of people in the fediverse have social and reasoning skills similar to those on 4chan.

      They just don’t get it because they live in a bubble with other people who don’t get it.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        4chan in the early days was just trolls wanting to piss people off. Apart from the occasional post that was truely fucked up, which the community generally made sure the authorities found out who made it.

        The current landscape is a bunch of people all wanting to circle jerk themselves to feel virtuous.

        The world is just a fucking pathetic eco-chamber now. And I’m a flirty whore for engaging in it.