• Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    You didn’t need to do all that work. You could have just clicked on drag’s profile. It says drag uses person-independent drag/dragself pronouns. You could have looked at drag’s post history and seen posts about drag’s gender. You decided to reinvent the wheel.

    The grammatical problem with this is that the ‘pronoun’ they are using is their own nickname.

    And you messed up. Drag isn’t drag’s nickname. Baator, the post you were replying to was about drag having comments removed that said drag isn’t a nickname.

    Your analysis didn’t add to the discussion because you were two steps behind everybody who either read drag’s bio or read the post. And that’s the thing about understanding us queer people. If you want to understand us, then listen to us. Ask questions if the answers aren’t obvious to you. You don’t explain your own assumptions to other people as if they’re authoritative information. That’s just causing more problems for queer people.

    If you had clicked on drag’s profile, you would have seen posts about drag’s gender on Blahaj Zone and lemmy.ca, where people asked questions and drag answered. Those people have it figured out. They know how to listen to queer people. Why doesn’t everyone?

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      You could have looked at drag’s post history and seen posts about drag’s gender. You decided to reinvent the wheel.

      Thats what I did Drag, that’s what I said I did.

      I did linguistic analysis by reading your profile and post/comment history.

      I am queer myself, and also neurodiverse, and I am not talking about your gender, I am talking about your communication style.

      I have known tons of queer, gay, lesbian, bi, trans, etc people and you are the only person I’ve ever met that uses ‘person independent pronouns.’

      I’ve even dated a trans person with dissociative identity disorder, whose different identities had different genders, but this person would still use I and My, would still use he or she or they depending on which alter I was interacting with.

      If your username is Dragon Rider, 99% of people will view your use of Drag or drag as a nickname, the same way John is often a shortened version of Johnathan.

      Drag isn’t drag’s nickname.

      99.9% of people, who use standard English grammatical rules, including myself, a former copywriter for a university newspaper, automatically interperet “drag’s” in this sentence as you referring to yourself in the third person.

      99.9% of people would say “Drag isn’t my nickname.”

      I know that you like to describe it as person independent pronouns, but that is a confusing, foreign concept to 99.9% of English speakers who are not part of a very small part of the already comparitively small queer / neurodiverse community/ies.

      If I were to go around saying “That is not what spec said, spec claimed that blah blah blah…”, never using standard first person pronouns…

      I would encounter exactly the same confusion, people would think I was referring to myself in the third person, by a nickname.

      • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        But drag isn’t encountering confusion. You’re not confused. You fully understand drag and you just disagree. Your stated reason for disagreeing is that it’s confusing, but that doesn’t make sense because you’re not confused anymore. You were confused when drag made that post, but you’re not confused anymore and you still think there’s a problem. There’s not. You eventually understood, and so will everyone else.

        • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          He didn’t disagree. He’s trying to tell you, creating prescriptive grammar rules will make you less understood. You have decided to add a conlang feature to the English language. Your expectations on this are impossible to meet, because it requires the people that you are speaking with both research you AND internalize this rule only you have prescribed.

          • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            It worked when other trans people decided that pronouns are something a person chooses for themself, rather than something society chooses for a person. People have just forgotten that. Drag will remind them, and it will be fine.

            • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s not about picking specific pronouns, though. People want to be addressed in a manner consistent with their gender identity. What is your gender identity?

                • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Could you provide an article or some description expanding on that? I don’t know how that is a gender, instead of an occupation/ preference

                  • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 days ago

                    Genders can be occupations too. Womanhood spent several thousand years being basically equal to domestic servant. And have you ever heard the line “join the army and become a man”? Among the Bugis people of indonesia, “priest” is a nonbinary gender.