• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    They court voters all the time. They don’t court nonvoters.

    They conveniently designate those they don’t want to listen to as nonvoters, and pay no actual attention to whether the demographics they ignore are voters or not. “They don’t vote” is a pretext and has never been anything else.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They don’t have to “designate” people as nonvoters. A nonvoter is someone who doesn’t vote. Nonvoters designate themselves.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Until the election has passed and they haven’t voted, only then are they nonvoters. Before the election, calling them nonvoters is just an excuse to ignore them.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          No, there is a specific term for people like that: “First time voters”. And they are courted by all parties.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            It’s never occurred to you that parties need to actually try to retain voters to keep them from staying home in disgust?

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Again, the vast majority of nonvoters are politically disengaged. They don’t stay home out of disgust, they stay home because they don’t care.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Again, they weren’t nonvoters until after the election. They were ignored before the election.

                Now keep ignoring what I’m saying and repeat yourself. I voted in 2024, but that won’t stop you from declaring me a nonvoter so you can ignore me. It’s way easier than listening.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  I know you aren’t a nonvoter, and I never said you were one.

                  Nonvoters include people who don’t bother to register and people who say they don’t plan to vote. So they can be identified before an election.

                  And despite what many seem to think, the vast majority of nonvoters would not become voters even if a candidate had done X, whether X is “support Palestine” or “support trans people” or “stop talking about trans people” or whatever else.

                  People love to project their personal politics onto nonvoters, but the fact is that nonvoters are nonvoters mainly because they do not care about politics.

                  It’s really no different than other human activities. For example, I don’t watch NASCAR races because I do not care about NASCAR. And NASCAR drivers ignore me, which is fine. Because even if they were highly interested in me, there is literally nothing they could do that would make me want to watch NASCAR.

                  I am a NASCAR “non-watcher”. Well, turns out lots of people feel the same about politics as I do about NASCAR.