• Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      There was always the need for a fig leaf… and the shame of someone pointing out that fig leaf. Now there’s neither.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        Those were nothing but a virtue signal, and only provided a false sense of security.

        History has proven most politicians are criminals who have no virtue.

  • IHeartBadCode@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    10 days ago

    This is just Trump rescinding Executive Order 13989. Highlights from that EO.

    • No accepting gifts from registered lobbyists or lobbying organizations
    • Revolving door ban, outgoing. (That’s leaving the White House and going directly to work for a job you previously were over in the White House)
    • Revolving door ban, incoming. (That’s being a lobbyist and then getting hired into a department you lobbied.)
    • Revolving door ban, holding the door. (You can’t help others get in or out of a department into or hired from a lobby directly related to the department in question)
    • Golden Parachute Ban. (No hiring you if you had a golden parachute)
    • Vampire clause, everything agreed to here, everyone who reports to the person who agreed must agree to it.

    So the first item is lobbying as usual, but the rest dealt with who could and couldn’t be hired/considered for nominations.

    Power cited in the EO was 3 USC § 301, 5 USC § 3301,7301.

    IMHO: I think the title is horrible.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    It was already legal.

    SCOTUS has consistently ruled in the favor of conservative politicians grifting such that you can literally pay a politician for services rendered and not go to prison.

  • nexusband@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    I mean, in theory, this could be used by the Democrats as well and fight back with…

    On a side note: Those Hitler comparisons are stupid, imho as a German. Hitler and his entire staff was actually quite competent and benefited the German people - Trump and his cronies are basically just corrupt and don’t think further than their own nose points. They also don’t help the American people in any way - quite the contrary… Doesn’t make them any less dangerous, but Hitler got nearly 80% of votes in fair elections back then…Trump cheated and heavily used voter suppression, so that’s also very different.

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Hitler got nearly 80% of votes in fair elections back then…

      No, he didn’t. His party did

      • nexusband@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Semantics.

        The NSDAP relied on the appeal of Adolf Hitler and advertised with the effective slogan “Work and bread”. It announced an immediate economic program and job creation measures. The SPD demanded a fundamental restructuring of the economy through nationalization and neglected the demand for job creation.

        Hitler was the face of the NSDAP, most Voters believed him and specifically voted for the NSDAP.

        https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstagswahl_Juli_1932

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Not really. Just rescinded a bunch of Biden executive orders

    Not that it matters when congress won’t enforce emoluments clause violations