• trolololol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    How does that help?

    I didn’t read the article, I came here for the jokes but then you got me curious

    • Otter@lemmy.caM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      So my understanding is that

      • apps can let them collect a lot more data than the website version. Apps have access to a bunch of device APIs, they might be running all the time vs a website tab that you close afterwards, etc.
      • you just open a link vs. logging in through the play store

      On top of that if you want to lock down further, it’s easier to use a privacy respecting browser than it is to sandbox the apps to. For the average person it’s easier to go from using the app to opening the website in a browser, than it is to swap their OS to GrapheneOS and set up sandboxing

      That’s also why a lot of websites mess with the mobile site, they want you to use the app

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I can tell you exactly what data an app can connect since I’m an android developer, but not web since I can’t dev JavaScript. My understanding is that the gap is quite small.

        About “always running” that’s a complicated scenario and that’s not the best way to put into layman terms. And it has improved heaps in the last 5 years, gradually.

        Marketers love these apps because they could send you notifications, " reminding" you that you’ve not being using the app enough and driving “engagement”. There’s heaps of companies whose main or only product is give marketers a dashboard to send push with pre sets targeting user profiles.