• Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the rock that keeps the Earth right side up. If you knock it off we flip upside down and Australia gets to rule the planet.

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t care how long this has been going on, I ain’t fucking around near that thing.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        If cats could read and open doors, they would collectively go to Finland to push it over with a huge mass of pure cat power.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          With some levers, definitely doable. With just paws? Eh.

          Also, cats can definitely open doors. Not all cats, but I know a few.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I get that’s what you meant, but technically the way it was worded…

              And the cats I know are cats who frequently roam outdoors and are Finnish. Perhaps they’ve just not seen this post, as outside cats rarely doomscroll.

                • Dasus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Being literate isn’t a requirement for scrolling though, although I do hesitate on how much “doom” applies to things like this.

                  But that’s clearly an indoors house-cat, so my hypothesis that outside cats doomscroll less is still valid.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, in a lot of places a period is used for order-of-magnitude separation and comma is used for decimal places.

      In this title the use seems inconsistent.

      • fitjazz@lemmyf.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        Either the rock weighs exactly 500kg to an impressive precision and has been there for eleven thousand years or it weighs five hundred thousand kg and has been there for exactly 11 years.

      • abysmalpoptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Right, i think he’s asking if there’s some culture where the inconsistency is designed based on unit. So, for example, period for years, comma for weight.

        I think it’s simply an error. Maybe AI generated?

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Finland uses space for thousands (and comma for decimals), so an article in Finnish would have 500 000 kg

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t care how long it been balancing there I wouldn’t dare stand that close to it, be just my luck it pick that moment to shrift.

    • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      8 months ago

      The ice sheet covering northern europe started to melt away, and with that we got what is called “glacial erratics”. Rocks had traveled from once place to another, and then settled. In Sweden we call those “giants throw”, because it was assumed that the only way those big rocks could be where they are was if a giant had thrown it.

      • aname@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        In Finland those are called siirtolohkare (moved boulder) or hiidenkivi (devil’s rock)

        • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think we have the same terminology then, we also call them “flyttblock”. Is there a story behind them being called Devil’s rock? It sounds very finnish to me to be honest.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well “hiisi” translates to “devil” but that’s very much a political translation as far as such things existed back then.

            Translating “Hiisi” as “the Devil” is quite a fuck-the-pagans translation.

            Hiisi (Finnish pronunciation: [ˈhiːsi]; plural hiidet [ˈhiːdet]) is a term in Finnic mythologies, originally denoting sacred localities and later on various types of mythological entities

            Hiisi was originally a spirit of hill forests (Abercromby 1898). In Estonian hiis (or his) means a sacred grove in trees, usually on elevated ground. In the spells (“magic songs”) of the Finns the term Hiisi is often used in association with a hill or mountain, as a personage he also associated with the hills and mountains, such as the owner or ruler of the same. His name is also commonly associated with forests, and some forest animals.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiisi

            I think “the Fae” would be a more accurate translation, theology-wise.

          • aname@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s not literally devil (paholainen) but Hiisi, which is something similar in finnish mythology which obviously doesn’t have a translation.

            It’s likely simply “only devil could have brought that stone here”

  • summerof69@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I can’t believe it weights just 500kg! But what happened 11 years ago? Who put it there?

    • stom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      You reguegitated the top comment from Reddit, where this was posted 24 hours before it was posted here.

      • summerof69@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m sorry that somebody wrote a similar post on reddit. I hope you’ll forgive me one day for having similar thoughts…

        • stom@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s bad enough that this post is a direct copy of a trending Reddit post (down to the weird number formatting), to find the comments are also just copy pasted highlights of stunning lack of originality

      • iegod@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        The tireless work of the repost police must be exhausting. You lone hero you.

    • Veloxization@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Finland is not close enough to the edges of tectonic plates, so if we get earthquakes here at all, they’re barely noticeable.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        so if we get earthquakes here at all, they’re barely noticeable.

        …and caused by the sea bed rising after it was compressed because of the weight of the glacier during the ice age

        • Veloxization@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Being in the middle of the large and relatively stable Eurasian plate does help, though. The Mediterranean region, being closer to the edge region, does experience quite a bit more, though, and some strong ones have historically been felt all the way up here, too.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    The age sends my imagination racing, I wonder if there was a Proto-Indo-European name for it, as a remote curiosity/enigma.

    “They say that somewhere up north, half a moon beyond the most remote village, there is a large stone put on top of another by the hand of the Earth Goddess herself.”

  • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not convinced that weighs 500 tons, that’s the same as at least 65 of the largest African elephants or 2.5 of the largest blue whales

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      After some googling, some of the heavier rock types are 3g/cm^3, which is 3000kg/m^3

      If we use the person as a rough ruler of 1.6m, the rock is about 5 person wide, and 3 person high (eye measure), give or take. And if we say it’s 3 person deep, then it has a rough mass of 5*3*3*1.6*3000 = 216 000 kg, which is in the same order of magnitude.

      Close enough to check out, I’d say.

      Edit: I realized since the actual ruler we use is 1.6m (assumed), it should be multiplied by 1.6 three times (one for each dimension/length), not just once. If we do that, we end up with 921 600 kg instead, putting 500 000 kg well within the range of possibilities from a quick calculation.

      Edit 2: as pointed out below, the actual correct estimation would be 553 tons

      • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Your edit is correct except I get 553 tons! I’m still shocked it’d easily tip the scales vs 2 large blue whales

        Edit: ahh you accidentally did 5x5x3 instead of 5x3x3

      • Hule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        You got me confused.

        5*3*3*1.6*3000

        is the same as

        [(5*1.6) + (3*1.6) + (3*1.6)]*3000

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          5*3*3*1.6 is not the same as (5*1.6)*(3*1.6)*(3*1.6), however

          The reason we multiply with 1.6 on every dimension is because the ruler we use is 1.6m long. We effectively create a new unit, and have to convert. If a length is 5 person wide, then in reality it’s 5*1.6 = 8 meters long, where 1.6 is the conversion ratio from the unit of ‘person’ to the unit of ‘meter’. And this applies for every individual measurement.

          Also, 5*3*3*1.6 is not the same as (5*1.6)+(3*1.6)+(3*1.6) in the first place

    • Bob@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Morning, yes, I’ll have 65 of your largest African elephants please.