Nope. She got 52 out of 53 Republican votes. If you only listen to left wing media, you probably won’t figure out why the Republicans don’t have issues with her gender and race.
What does the number of votes have to do with her support of a ruthless dictator like Bashar Assad? All that proves is that Republicans are fine with her supporting a horrible ruthless dictator that tortured and murdered countless people. You can make this about her race and gender all you like, but all you’re doing is ignoring the quotes of her saying literal things and support of both him and Russia in that article. Not that I’m surprised that you’re ignoring her actual words that she said. It makes it much easier to defend her if you ignore them. Not honest, but easier.
Hey, what’s it like working at the troll farm, knowing that large language models are all of two seconds from ending your job? Do you have any other prospects lined up?
It is amazing that Democrat senators unanimously vote against a former Democrat who is a minority woman.
Former Democrat… Current russian asset…fuck off
That stupid claim started with Hillary making the accusation without providing evidence.
Lol no it’s not, she’s did that to herself basically believing russian propaganda and aligning with it.
She gave her honest opinion.
No she spews out russian propaganda…
She is free to speak on the point of view that you don’t like.
Cool. How about the fact that she was very pro-Assad and praising Russia for backing him?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/tulsi-gabbard-russian-connection-dni-trump-syria-b2692244.html
You can read the literal words she says in that article, but something tells me you won’t.
So if you say something positive about let say Pelosi, then you have ties with Pelosi? What kind of logic is that?
Do you think that maybe being pro-Assad and praising Russia for backing him might make her a poor choice for the role she’s been handed?
Nope. She got 52 out of 53 Republican votes. If you only listen to left wing media, you probably won’t figure out why the Republicans don’t have issues with her gender and race.
What does the number of votes have to do with her support of a ruthless dictator like Bashar Assad? All that proves is that Republicans are fine with her supporting a horrible ruthless dictator that tortured and murdered countless people. You can make this about her race and gender all you like, but all you’re doing is ignoring the quotes of her saying literal things and support of both him and Russia in that article. Not that I’m surprised that you’re ignoring her actual words that she said. It makes it much easier to defend her if you ignore them. Not honest, but easier.
It shows that Republicans are willing to try something new after many decades of failed foreign policies.
Oh look, another person to block.
Hey, what’s it like working at the troll farm, knowing that large language models are all of two seconds from ending your job? Do you have any other prospects lined up?
You are the one working at a troll farm.
Close, I’m actually working at your mom’s house.
^ name checks out. 🤣
Interesting that to the left, liberty is considered bad.
Yes, focus on that and ignore the fact that she’s in a cult take takes homophobia to grand new heights.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_of_Identity_Foundation
WTF? What does being a minority woman have to do with anything?