• Sturgist@lemmy.ca
    9·
    2 days ago

    Almost everything you said isn’t true. Point to the rule that says someone can’t disclose a DM they were part of? Unethical? Sure.

    And I mean everyone can disclose anything in their posession.

    It’s just not allowed

    Make up your mind.

    Also Drag is a troll. Has suggested that several people commit suicide. Drag doesn’t get a pass. Drag is a piece of shit. Don’t be Drag.

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        6·
        2 days ago

        You’re a shitposter, and I’ve told you I disagree with you more often than I agree. But fuck me, Drag is verifiably a piece of shit. When you don’t, and i say this with love, have your head up your ass…I’ll have your back.

        I’m being catty. Hoping you vibe with the teasing. Work drinks, last joke before bed. Hope I nailed it… Just like I nailed your mum!

        OK, I’ll stop for real.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          2·
          2 days ago

          When you don’t, and i say this with love, have your head up your ass…I’ll have your back.

          I think the best I am do is 30%, take it or leave it!

          NO MUM

          • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
            1·
            8 hours ago

            God damnit. See this is what I mean. I see a moronic comment, I look over and see it’s your username. No need to follow your “content” or watch your history when you’re stupid all over the place.

              • hendrik@palaver.p3x.deEnglish
                2·
                5 hours ago

                Whatever you do, it’s not working properly. You seem to be mentioning me? All I get is a notification bell and your eyes emoji here. But I’m lacking context. So… You need to repeat your question or info, if this isn’t just a technical/federation error.

          • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
            4·
            2 days ago

            Since your mum and I bumped uglies, that de-facto makes me your dad. I’m a responsible parent, and I love unconditionally. 30% is the best you can do, and that’s enough.

    • hendrik@palaver.p3x.deEnglish
      2·
      2 days ago

      Not sure where you live, and I don’t know much about US law, but for me, it’s §203 and §206 StGB. Get’s you either fined, or up to a maximum of 1 or 5 years in jail. And especially §206 is super clear and specifically mentions electronic letters. I can assure you, I’m 100% correct on that.

      • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        7·
        2 days ago

        It depends on the state. My state is a one party state, meaning any person that is party to a private conversation can legally reveal everything in it to the public.

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.deEnglish
          1·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, I figured we’d need to track the criminal down to a specific contry and state and then ask a lawyer to make sure. We’re super strict here. If someone uses the voice recorder app or takes a video with sound in a private conversation, that’s already a serious thing. Of course similar restrictions apply to phone calls, letters and electronic conversation.

          Reading US law isn’t easy for me, I mean there’s always a lot involved and then there are laws on two or three levels plus exemptions and additional rules… I wonder if such a freedom in a one party state applies to people like whistleblowers and other unruly people as well…

          • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            3·
            2 days ago

            On paper, whistleblowers have federal protection from prosecution. In reality, however, if you blow the whistle on a rich person, a corporation, or the government, the government will go out of its way to punish you and make an example. See Edward Snowden, who is still wanted by the government, despite having revealed the government was engaged in what was then highly illegal espionage against their own citizens. The government responded by making that invasion of privacy legal.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            1·
            2 days ago

            Of course similar restrictions apply to phone calls, letters and electronic conversation.

            I am sure US mega corps are complying and the law is enforced against them

            • hendrik@palaver.p3x.deEnglish
              1·
              2 days ago

              Not sure, I’ve never worked for an US mega corp. And those really don’t seem to like the law, or worker unions who start complaining and blow it up once someone gets mistreated/surveilled by their employer… Honestly, I’m not sure where we’re at, overall. I’ve read about both things happen, corporations getting sued / fined and getting away with exploiting their employees.

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        3·
        2 days ago

        I’m from Canada and live in the UK. You’re allowed to, barring some very specific circumstances, record or repeat any conversation you are party to. If you were posting a DM convo that your friend was having, taking pictures of their screen while they were out of the room and then putting it online. You’re fucked. If you are an active participant of a conversation/DM chain then as party to said communication you have the legal right to tell anyone, record it for reporting to the news, or the cops, or your gf.

        • hendrik@palaver.p3x.deEnglish
          2·
          2 days ago

          The internet seems to suggest it’s illegal in the UK, for example to share recorded phone calls. According to the first page of Google, recording itself is fine, while sharing or making them public isn’t. But I haven’t looked up the specifics.