Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

  • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Muricans won’t show up to elect a woman as president and y’all need to figure this out.

    I love AOC but if she ran as president you’re gonna see exactly what happened the last two times a woman ran.

    Gotta be realistic. It’s a shitty reality but it is the reality we live in.

    Walz is a good candidate with a history of helping his citizens. AOC is a firecracker for sure, but the public isn’t going to elect a woman of color. They just aren’t.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s what they said about black men until one ran as a progressive and won twice by sizable margins. Perhaps it’s not the race / gender that’s the biggest hindrance but the policies.

      • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        That was a VERY different time. We didn’t have these little screens programming our social views.

        I’ve said it in other replies that I hope I’m wrong, but we’ve been backsliding for some time, now.

        Kinda like how we saw a lot of white civil rights supporters in the 60s go flying to the right.

        We’ve been here before.

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          I don’t want to hear any of this nonsense until a progressive loses a general election. Until then, all you’re doing is repeating the talking points neoliberals need people to believe in order to keep trying the same bullshit over and over.

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 days ago

      Clinton was old guard. Harris was more or less trying to be a continuance of the same damn thing. I’d like AOC to at least be on the primary ballot.

      • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        I would too. I like her. A lot.

        I just don’t think she would have as good a chance as we all wish she could.

        Make no mistake, I would LOVE to be wrong here, I would love to think the Murican people have evolved enough to realize that a woman in charge would probably be in our best interest, I just don’t see it happening. At least not in 2028

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I give exactly zero fucks that she’s a woman. I don’t think a woman in charge would be in our best interest. I don’t think a man in charge would be in our best interest.

          We need a leader who has the actual ability to evaluate the system, figure out what’s broken with EVIDENCE, and can articulate it.

    • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t think it will happen because

      A) she’s a woman and they’ve tried that twice already

      And more importantly B) she has said many times she doesn’t agree with a lot of the democratic party’s policies. She has beliefs that would undoubtedly vibe with a ton of voters but there’s been a very obvious pattern of both parties only primary-ing “fly right” candidates.

      I think Bernie scared the crap out of them and they don’t want a repeat of that. Heaven forbid we get a candidate actually for the people!

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Called this. “Harris lost because she’s a woman of color” was always a preemptive excuse for shutting out AOC.

      The party is holding back women in order to hamstring one person, and it’s gross.

      • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        It wasn’t the singular reason she lost.

        There were many.

        But it IS a factor, an ugly one but one people seriously need to come to terms with.

        But apparently I hate AOC for pointing this out

    • TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s not about the gender at all. Dems don’t seem to care about that. They care about having a reason to get off the couch. The only time Republicans win is when Dems can’t be bothered to get their asses moving.

      What matters is having someone exciting enough to get the Dems to show up to the booth. Neither Hillary nor Kamala brought fresh energy or anything exciting except a continuation of the status quo establishment.

      Please, no Tim Waltz either. I love the guy but my god, we need something fresh besides another sweet grandpa on the ballot.

      Please, democrats. No. We have to do better. Biden barely slid by in 2020. Ffs. No more sweet grandpa’s scuffling around the debate stage.