What makes this worse is the obvious disrespect from Cowbee of my request to disengage. I made it very clear I didn’t want to argue. These communities have absolutely no standards of behaviour for members of the in-group. Which is exactly why I don’t engage with them in these communities.
Well, also the fact that I hate being constantly called a liberal for not repeating Capitalist Putin’s latest botfarm talking point. Talking to these people is an exercise in keeping my calm while I am constantly insulted. No thank you.
Maybe there’s more context here that I’m missing, but from what I can see…
YDI/BPR
If you don’t want to argue, stop typing or block them. Real childish pot stirring behaviour going on there. You can’t try and get the last word in by saying “don’t respond to my criticism.”
I don’t want to argue, but I do want to get the last word in, and I also want to explain that my reason for not arguing is that I know Cowbee by reputation and I refuse to be sealioned and trolled by him. I’d be very happy to say my piece without any sealioning and trolling, which is what I tried to make happen, but alas, once again he used the old “Why won’t you talk to me :(”, just like my ex does when she’s been drinking.
Those are essentially mutually exclusive…
If someone wants to argue with you, and you want to disengage, you have to accept that you’re not going to get the last word in no matter how many times you say “don’t argue with me” - cause you can’t control what they can say afterwards.
This is especially true, and comes off as childish, when you’re the one that baited that argument in the first place with “your piece”.
This reminds me of the behaviour in young siblings where one will initiate, and when the anticipated response comes, they launch in to “Mom, they’re touching me!”
You clearly do want to argue, you just don’t want to be argued back with. Either that, or you’re just trying to provoke a response.
I’d be happy to have an argument without trolling, sealioning, and calling people liberals
He didn’t accuse you of not being a leftist, he accused the Democrats™ of that.
Your comment there as well as your description as an anarchist seem to imply that your are not a Democrat yourself but you merely want them to win instead of Trump (lesser evil and all that).
You apparently called them a Trump supporter (which is calling someone not a leftist as you admit you did).
You feel disrespected by people arguing with you after you argued against the original post. Then you come here and say the quiet part loud.
I don’t want to argue, but I do want to get the last word in
… YDI
Why even waste time on lemmy.ml?
Ignoring the points of the argument, you have to tell them to “disengage” with nothing else posted in your comment to them. I have a troll following me around every time I talk about a certain topic and the only way to get them to stop (for a brief moment) is to say “disengage.” I’ve made it clear I don’t want to talk to them anymore, multiple times, but still I have to type “disengage” every time they reply to me the same exact bad faith shit they always say.
If you don’t want to deal with them altogether, you have to consider blocking them. The troll I’ve been dealing with has tried to egg me and others into blocking them, they celebrate each time they get blocked. So I also understand if you don’t want to block them, they are miserable people who enjoy feeding on negativity. The fact trolls roam lemmy can dampen your enjoyment, it really does suck.
Interesting. What’s the value of an explicit “disengage” compared to just not replying?
Well for one: silence isn’t disengaging sometimes, so they may keep replying.
Sometimes you’d want to add extra context before you disengage too; for this we will take action against people who break the rule (on our instance)
You can’t say “Disengage! Also you’re stupid.” as some “last word own”. If that is said then they’ll have to deal the consequences; we won’t do anything abt it.
Lay with the tankies, get the tracks.
Fight pigs, get dirty.
If you haven’t blocked .ml yet at this point, that’s probably on you
Similar to @Enkers@sh.itjust.works, I suspect I’m lacking some context here, but based purely on what I can see in this post, you came across as rather childish. I’m inclined to say YDI/BPR.
While I do agree that rule should have applied to Cowbee too, that doesn’t give you carte-blanche to do the same.
Also, confronting someone you know to be a troll in an intentionally inflammatory manner, then getting annoyed that they chose to argue with you is like waving a red flag in front of a bull and being surprised it charged at you…
You baited that argument, so I don’t have much sympathy for you in that regard.
Honestly you probably deserved that one. I think a ban is a bit much but it is only 2 days and you were goading
Forget it, Jake. It’s .ml.
If you legit don’t want to argue, just disengage. No one owes you silence.
I think this one might legit be a YDI, or close to it.
There sure is a lot of arguing in these comments from someone who said they didn’t want to argue.
They don’t want to argue but want to always get the last word in 🙃
Well we’re not on .ml right now, so I’m fine with arguing
Yeah they really do not like it when you call out their game. It’s because they actually think they are being clever and that everyone can’t already see they are just Trump trolls.
YDI.
If you post a claim or an accusation on the Internet, you’re expected to back it up. If you don’t want to back it up, then don’t make any accusations in the first place.
Ahhhh, if they’d picked a different rule to cite, it would be a YDI because the comment was borderline against rule 1. But if the mod can’t be bothered to cite the right rule out of two rules total, then they’re half-assing the job.
I dunno if it’s a power tripping bastard. Maybe a LFB? Lazy fucking bastard? Definitely bad moderation though.
Edit: also, you double posted by accident
I did? I can only see one post from my instance. Both from my profile and from the community. Might be a federation issue?
My comment was against instance rule 2. Which to me suggests an admin must have done the ban. I hate that the .ml admins just number rules and don’t say whether they’re community or instance rules. It’s not transparent to the people who are banned, unless they put in a bunch of work to figure it out.
I intentionally broke rule 2, because .ml users do it all the fucking time. Cowbee does it in this screenshot. We’re both accusing each other of not being leftists. He doesn’t get punished for it. Why? Because he’s an ML and I’m an anarchist. ML users always call anarchists liberals, and it’s never dealt with. So I treat them the same way, and take my knocks for it. This post isn’t about a ban. It’s about the rules being selectively enforced. It’s about the ban Cowbee didn’t get.
I mean, if you intentionally broke the rule, what the fuck are you doing posting it here?
This post isn’t about a ban. It’s about the rules being selectively enforced. It’s about the ban Cowbee didn’t get.
Dude, if you’re running around breaking rules on purpose, to bait mods into removing comments, and temporarily banning you, you’re the power tripping bastard, not them.
Also, you showed the conversation. Cowbee didn’t do anything ban worthy, by either mods of that C/, or the instance.
You’re trying to stir shit, and you should have been permanently banned from the instance because of that.
If anything, the actions taken were extremely lenient with your intent in mind
PTB
.ML is cancer on a good day, literal chinese propaganda on an avg day.
Block the whole instance, nothing good comes from it.
Link to thread?
