• Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    4 days ago

    I left Reddit because they killed 3rd party apps. Since that day, they’ve only gone on to butcher the platform even further.

    Joining Lemmy was a damn good decision.

    • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Enshitification drives stock prices. Only the rich care about stock prices and they have no interest in using the platform. The platform dies off a death of a thousand cuts… story as old as time

        • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Because they make the product worse to gate working features behind a paywall without spending development time and money. It’s the opposite of innovation, it’s going backwards. The parasite class (investors) reward that behavior with more investment because now the company has increased profits by selling the working used-to-be-free features at a premium. They couple that with buybacks and layoffs to juice the stock price … and then discard the husk of a company and start a new one

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Context:

    Reddit will now issue warnings to users who “upvote several pieces of content banned for violating our policies” within “a certain timeframe,” starting first with violent content, the company announced on Wednesday.

    “This will have no impact on the vast majority of users as most already downvote or report abusive content,” a Reddit employee says in the announcement post. In comments on the post, a user expressed concern that the new policy could make people “paranoid about voting,” but the employee says that “this would be an unacceptable side effect, which is why we want to monitor this closely and ramp it up thoughtfully.”

    If it violates policies, remove it and move on. This is weird.

    “We have done this in the past for quarantined communities and found that it did help to reduce exposure to bad content, so we are experimenting with this sitewide,” according to the main post. Reddit “may consider” expanding the warnings in the future to cover repeated upvotes of other kinds of actions as well as taking other types of actions in addition to warnings.

    Now that there is Thoughtcrime territory.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      “Hey investors look away from the huge pile of porn we’re hosting and look at these cool content filters we’re adding”.

    • BlueLineBae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      This reminds me lots of when Facebook started applying warnings/bans/etc retroactively to content without any context. I remember getting several wrist slaps in the same month for content I had shared a decade prior that really wasn’t all that bad. But Facebook decided it was a problem and made me question what I was allowed to post in the future. It didn’t take long after that for me to stop using Facebook completely.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        and reddit is copying the same methods, retroactively banning people, additionally any old acct with comments that are also old can be reported by other users still.

  • CabbageRelish@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    It’s actually old hat. Users on r/cth (where hexbear came from) were catching admin bans for upvoting the “wrong” posts years ago.

      • CabbageRelish@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Stuff along the lines of Luigi-posting. CTH was much more of a proper “all the left” community with everyone from soc dems on up that was largely just filled with anti-establishment shit posters. But, we loved John Brown etc.

      • nectar45@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        they often approve of the racial genocides, hunting down of the lgbt and other morally reprehensible stuff this authoritarian regimes did.

        Tankies are economically leftwing but their social views can be…questionable

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I do not believe without a source that Reddit admins were banning chapos for upvoting positive-spin genocide. Not that I doubt it happened, but if they were doing that there wouldn’t have been anyone left in the conservative subs (except for reasons, of course)

          I can believe chapo was one of the subs that would ban you for doing it or commenting in the wrong sub like AgainstHateSubs would but that’s a different claim than what you’re making.

          That all said, it’s probably pretty hard to find a source for decade old Reddit drama at this point, but if you’ve got one let it rip.

      • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        CTH was not very moderative of leftist hot takes. One of the things that probably contributed to their ban was that they regularly brigaded other subreddits (this was a common complaint throughout Reddit when I used it), and they regularly left calls for violence up such as “Guillotine Biden Now”. They were also accused of ban evasion and other minor things.

        EDIT: As another vector of this, there were similar accusations leveled at CTH as hexbear and Lemmy grad, where users claimed being banned for not buying more extreme views.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The exact wording seems to be “banned content”, which includes a lot more than just violence (is violence banned in the first place, considering subs like r/PublicFreakout?).

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah tbh if it were just violent content I’d be fine with that. I still don’t trust Reddit as a platform anymore, but I’d be 100% understanding of the rule.

      Banned/Removed-by-Admin content, though? That’s absurd. That’s way too broad.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        “Violent content” could also be videos of officer misconduct, and there’s the whole can of worms of what “promoting violence” means.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Guarantee something like posting a picture of Luigi will be considered banned content promoting violence.

        Edit: Called it

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well tbf most of those are unless you’re saying “I don’t think this is the killer” or resharing a news article. He’s not celebrated for pacifism.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think it’s advocating violence, and extreme violence (things like terrorist beheading videos and such) that are banned. Things like Waffle House fights likely won’t meet the banning threshold.

      • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.ukM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        I assume this is prompted by Luigi-inspired death threats to CEOs. If they are monitoring this so closely, I bet the FBI might want to take a look at those records too…

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I think it very well could, as well as any other reddit corporate agenda such as removing content at request of pieces of shit who punch and berate service staff and then later sue to remove said content from the internet. It’s a necessary distinction.

  • MochiGoesMeow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    I hate the uprising of the word tankie like the rise of the word woke. Just more language to make walls between people.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    In general, aligning with Tankies for any reason, ever, will just trigger a reactionary bias against whatever message you’re promoting. I’m not saying I dissagree automatically, but it’s the opposite of helping your case.

    When Tankies agree with a statement I have to stop for a moment and reassess how that statement can be used to maim and destroy western democracies or if they’re just making another show of pretending to have morals.

  • formulaBonk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just another way to allow hateful right wing content to stay up while punishing users who aren’t retarded for upvoting Luigi memes and saying trump is a fascist etc

    What else is new on Reddit? They should just pull the trigger and make an official bigots only policy like twitter

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    In case you’re wondering what’s considered “violent content” on Reddit and how far they’ll push this definition, calling the top 10 breakdown of healthcare CEOs “Luigi’s List” counts.