• Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ah, sweet sweet karma. Unfortunately modern medicine for an Important Person with lots of money will limit its reach, but I hope she has a really unpleasant reaction to the antivirals.

    This is notably the woman who, in response to a protest of West Bank land sales that was understaffed by the police said the answer is not to boost police presence at contentious protests, but just to do what she wanted to do already, have more police patrols.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Yet another misleading article from u/return2ozma.
    The mask ban was for protesters, and has nothing to do with Covid.

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s about responding to somewhat opposing public safety concerns. As someone else pointed out in this thread, when protestors are allowed to wear masks they are more likely to commit illegal acts, even violent ones. SARS-CoV-2 is no longer a novel virus. There is now significant immunity in the population and our COVID treatments are much improved, meaning the virus no longer constitutes a public health emergency.

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Rule 4:

      1. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

      The post title is the same as as the article title. As of right now, article title is: Los Angeles’s Mayor Was Contemplating a Mask Ban. She Just Got Covid.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I didn’t say he changed it, but he links these kinds of misinforming stories all the time.
        I originally wrote the article was misleading, but since they correct the misleading headline already in the first sentence, that wasn’t really true.
        So I changed it to the headline which is what is actually misleading.
        But since this is misunderstood, I have now changed it back.

        The fact of the matter is that u/return2ozma is flooding lemmy.world with misleading stories with misleading headlines, no matter how much they are the original headlines, they remain misleading. Those are often stories that in no way deserve to be spread.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          7 days ago

          I have certainly criticized OP for posting things before, but I’m really not seeing the issue here with their actions. They posted an informative article that you just need to read to understand the headline… or just read the one-sentence preview if you click on the post to comment.

          It isn’t their fault that the headline is deceptive. It’s a good article from what is normally a trustworthy outlet and it’s pretty much your fault if you don’t even bother to do the second of the two things I suggested.

          • doodledup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Have you read the article? Honest answers only. I feel lile you’re just here to stir. Like the rest of the hivemind downvoting comments that aren’t wrong.

  • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    On the one hand LA county has a massive crime issue and the masks aren’t helping. On the other hand, even without masks they still had a crime problem anyway because LASD (almost $4bn budget) sucks at their jobs and there isn’t a lot of support of the current Sherrif from deputies that has been trying to fix them. LAPD ($2bn budget) basically only takes care of the main part of LA city proper itself.

    Where I live break-in response times are around 4 hours and anything under that is measured in days, if they show up at all.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        7 days ago

        A mask ban for protesters would also limit our ability to stop a pandemic spreading. Mask bans are a bad idea (especially with creepy af facial recognition around).

    • sparkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      Cymraeg
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      For real. I wish it were these people killing themselves with their stupidity, not others…

    • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      7 days ago

      The considered ban on masks was for protesters.

      The idea of not allowing anonymity for protesters has its origins in combating racial violence and the KKK. Klan members suddenly lost a lot of their motivation to assemble in public, once they had to show their faces, those that did were less likely to commit illegal acts and the ones that did break the law were more likely to face legal reprocutions.

      The contemplated ban on masks for protesters in Los Angeles was considered following increased violence by masked protesters and was not motivated by covid denial.