Public outrage is mounting in China over allegations that a major state-owned food company has been cutting costs by using the same tankers to carry fuel and cooking oil – without cleaning them in between.

The scandal, which implicates China’s largest grain storage and transport company Sinograin, and private conglomerate Hopefull Grain and Oil Group, has raised concerns of food contamination in a country rocked in recent decades by a string of food and drug safety scares – and evoked harsh criticism from Chinese state media.

It was an “open secret” in the transport industry that the tankers were doing double duty, according to a report in the state-linked outlet Beijing News last week, which alleged that trucks carrying certain fuel or chemical liquids were also used to transport edible liquids such as cooking oil, syrup and soybean oil, without proper cleaning procedures.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It sure seems correct ✅

        Nato has become increasingly concerned about the growing military capabilities of China, which it sees as a threat to the security and democratic values of its members. source

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Do NATO wants a bunch of random political entities with access to nuclear weapons in your view do they? Considering China a threat does not mean they want China to collapse, they just want them to stop being so antagonistic. Perhaps a bit more democratic.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Do NATO wants a bunch of random political entities with access to nuclear weapons in your view do they?

            They didn’t seem to mind when the USSR collapsed. Why would they treat China differently?