A senior official with the Dutch Olympic committee has insisted that a convicted child rapist in its beach volleyball team is not a paedophile, in an email seen by the Guardian.

A concerned British man who has lived in the Netherlands for more than a decade, wrote to the Dutch Olympic committee and called the inclusion of Steven van de Velde in the team “a stain on the Dutch national side”. In a reply the Dutch Olympic committee spokesperson wrote: “Steven is NOT a peadophile [sic]; you really don’t think that de Dutch NOC would send someone to Paris who IS a real risk? No, he isn’t a risk.”

There has been mounting public anger at the presence of the beach volleyball player Van de Velde, who was convicted of raping a 12-year-old British girl in 2016. Earlier this week the International Olympic Committee faced calls for an investigation into how a convicted child rapist has been allowed to compete at Paris 2024. The IOC has said the selection of athletes for the Games was the responsibility of individual committees.

There has been mounting public anger at the presence of the beach volleyball player Van de Velde, who was convicted of raping a 12-year-old British girl in 2016. Earlier this week the International Olympic Committee faced calls for an investigation into how a convicted child rapist has been allowed to compete at Paris 2024. The IOC has said the selection of athletes for the Games was the responsibility of individual committees.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    She technically consented

    He got her drunk… Not only she was too young to consent, he made her drunk this invalidating any chance for valid consent even if she was much older.

    • GeoGio7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      They talked for a long time through messaging before hand and talked about having sex. Either way, she couldn’t consent she was just a child. Disgusting.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nothing you are saying mitigates this in any way. She was 12. None of the shit leading up to it should have happened either. If anything that makes it worse.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          While controversial, comment OPs point is a response to taking age out of the equation. All they are saying is that you shouldn’t do that. They’re not saying “It’s not rape,” or that he “isn’t a rapist.” Which… You seem to be agreeing with.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Well actually, If you set aside her age it wouldn’t be rape at all, since it’s statutory rape.

            • candybrie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              If adults talked about having sex, got drunk, and had sex, I don’t think people would generally consider it rape. That one of the people involved was 12 is what makes it absolutely rape and utterly disgusting.