The US secretary of state insists Venezuelans' votes in the recent presidential election "must count".

…

His intervention comes as the presidents of Brazil, Mexico and Colombia all called on Venezuela to release the full details of last Sunday’s election.

…

It has also attracted global criticism, with many governments around the world demanding the Venezuelan government release proof of the result.

The result has been recognised by Venezuelan allies China, Russia and Iran.

But, the US, European Union and other G7 countries have called on Mr Maduro’s government to release detailed voting data.

  • lennybird@lemmy.worldEnglish
    43·
    3 months ago

    This is not that.

    Most of those failed interventions of Latin America mind you come from conservative administrations. Blinken isn’t a Neocon.

    Maduro is corrupt as fuck and myriad independent nations and watchdogs corroborate the same point.

    • jonne@infosec.pubEnglish
      13·
      3 months ago

      Blinken hasn’t said anything about the IDF committing war crimes in Gaza despite overwhelming evidence, so I’m going to say he’s being selective at least when it comes to reviewing evidence.

      • lennybird@lemmy.worldEnglish
        30·
        3 months ago

        Yes that sucks. I have my thoughts on the Israeli conflict that add considerable nuance. However, we are discussing Latin America, which what I said is factually correct. Why are you deflecting to Israel now? I could just as easily point to Blinken highlighting the war crimes Russia has committed and which a Neocon never would’ve cared.

        Once again, many nations corroborate this, and Maduro is known to be corrupt from the outset.

        The allies supporting Maduro are… China…Iran… and Russia… Just bastions of freedom and transparency, amirite.

        • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
          7·
          3 months ago

          Just wanted to chime in and say that pointing to Blinken’s inconsistency on addressing oppressive regimes isn’t deflection, it’s context illuminating his motivations in the public statements he makes, this being one on Venezuela

          • lennybird@lemmy.worldEnglish
            8·
            3 months ago

            The way I see the current administration’s policy is this:

            • Obviously we’ve had longstanding defense agreements with Israel.
            • Obviously APAIC is an incredibly strong lobbyist
            • It’s dangerous to get ahead of polls and walk back defending Israel following October 7th
            • Especially when the Jewish-American electorate is every bit as vital to getting Democrats over the finish-line.
            • Now imagine if you will that Biden withdraws all aid to Israel, but then Bibi in a false-flag just so happens to say oopsies again and ignores intelligence and let’s another terrorist attack happen on Israeli soil. Democrats would lose in a landslide.

            I think ultimately a lot of the optics right now is framed around getting reelected and ensuring Trump, who would be far more pro-genocide, doesn’t get in the White House. Blinken is clearly echoing marching orders from Biden in that respect.

            Do I believe this administration at this point wants anything to do with Bibi in reality? Not really.

        • jonne@infosec.pubEnglish
          6·
          3 months ago

          My point is that Blinken/the state department have been caught lying before, so using them as a source of information is just not something one should do.

    • Shyfer@ttrpg.networkEnglish
      7·
      3 months ago

      Plenty of Democratic administrations have done coups and wars all over the world. It’s just a US empire policy, no matter who is President, mostly because of capitalism. Sure, conservatives are usually worse about it, but Democrats do it, too. Biden is supporting a genocide in Israel. McKinley fought the Philippines, Teddy Roosevelt in the Spanish American, JFK invaded Cuba and tried to coup it, Truman led the war in Korea and established a US puppet dictatorship in n the south for, JFK and LBJ were also involved in Vietnam, etc.