• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    Please explain why Putin would endorse the person who says that Ukraine should win the war over the person who won’t say that.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t need to explain anything. Again, I’m just citing facts, and you’re guessing. But honestly, how much do you think your armchair analytics are really worth? Or anyone’s for that matter?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        I just cited facts too.

        Harris wants Russia out of Ukraine.

        Trump refuses to say what he wants Russia to do.

        Why would Putin sincerely endorse Harris? I think you know the answer is that he wouldn’t.

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Because you, quote ‘don’t live under a rock’, was that the citation you consider a fact?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 months ago

            Again:

            Harris says Ukraine should win.

            Trump will not say who should win.

            This happened last night. I heard it with my own ears.

            So, again, why would Putin support the person who wants him to lose the war? Because, again, I think you know the answer.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                3 months ago

                My source of what? Those two claims? Again, the debate last night. Putin’s obviously bullshit endorsement of Harris? I can give you a source, but I’m not sure what your whole point here is if you didn’t know about that.

                • Murvel@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yes, of course, your source of why Putin made the endorsement, the source I asked for about 5 comments ago…

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    And, as I have explained to you multiple times, I do not need a source when I can make a basic inference from the facts at hand.

                    If you can come up for another explanation for why Putin would endorse the person who wants him to lose the war, let’s hear it.

                    Otherwise, you’re just harassing me because I said something mean about Putin.

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t need to explain anything.

        Don’t be coy; you simply cannot.

        You exist in bad faith, this goes so far beyond debate at this point lmao

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I just cited a quote. What do you want from me exactly(?) holy fuck…

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        There’s a big difference between citing facts and citing a statement. You likely have no evidence that the statement is a fact, besides taking the ex-kgb leader of an adversarial nations word at face value, which…does sound a little silly when you say it out loud like that, doesn’t it? Keep in mind this nation has definitely messed with our elections in the past too lol.

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The statement is the fact, and I put no more value to it than that. Make of that what you will, I really don’t care

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You are citing a statement, and it is a fact that the statement was said, but the content of that statement is not a fact because there’s very little evidence to support it being a fact. Lies exist, especially from the election meddling, ex KGB foreign adversary national leader types.