On Wednesday, Sanders introduced six resolutions blocking six sales of different weapons contained within the $20 billion weapons deal announced by the Biden administration in August. The sales include many of the types of weapons that Israel has used in its relentless campaign of extermination in Gaza over the past year.

“Sending more weapons is not only immoral, it is also illegal. The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and the Arms Export Control Act lay out clear requirements for the use of American weaponry – Israel has egregiously violated those rules,” said Sanders. “There is a mountain of documentary evidence demonstrating that these weapons are being used in violation of U.S. and international law.”

This will be the first time in history that Congress has ever voted on legislation to block a weapons sale to Israel, as the Institute for Middle East Understanding Policy Project pointed out. This is despite the U.S. having sent Israel over $250 billion in military assistance in recent decades, according to analyst Stephen Semler, as Israel has carried out ethnic cleansings and massacres across Palestine and in Lebanon.

The resolutions are not likely to pass; even if they did pass the heavily pro-Israel Congress, they would likely be vetoed by President Joe Biden, who has been insistent on sending weapons to Israel with no strings attached.

However, Sanders’s move is in line with public opinion. Polls have consistently found that the majority of the public supports an end to Israel’s genocide; a poll by the Institute for Global Affairs released this week found, for instance, that a majority of Americans think the U.S. should stop supporting Israel or make support contingent on Israeli officials’ agreement to a ceasefire deal. This includes nearly 80 percent of Democrats.

    • infinitevalence@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Also just a little slow to come around to reality like always.

      Edit… Down vote all you want I’m still a big Bernie fan but the whole US government has been on the wrong side of this war from the beginning. We treat Palestinian lives just like black and brown lives at home like they didn’t matter.

      Lastly Hamas is not Palestinian I can support Palestinians and condemn Hamas.

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        ·
        2 months ago

        He was criticizing the response since the beginning?

        Frankly I was initially supporting them, as I am against Hamas but Israel lost the objective, didn’t destroy Hamas and didn’t get hostages out. So what was all that for?

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            what you said, even if were to be true, does not contradict what I said so your comment does not make any sense

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        And doing so in a way that is going to accomplish almost nothing while antagonizing and alienating the people who would let him otherwise get positive legislature passed.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s easy to rage against the machine on a moral pedestal. It’s harder to actually steer the machine in the right direction.

      To be clear, I am supportive of putting things to a vote even if there’s no chance it succeeds. Get the votes on record. I think that’s an important archive that can be used later in election season to hold politicians accountable for their votes.

      I like what Bernie and AOC are doing when they push for these kinds of votes.

      But make no mistake. They can only do this from a position of being unable to effect any change. Under normal conditions, moves like this poison the well and make others on both sides less willing to work with you.

      They have the luxury of grandstanding specifically because they have zero hope of garnering support.

      Someone like a president can’t really do something like this without completely burning their political capital.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well, he was also a part of blocking the military aid to Ukraine for all those months. But this one is good

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hot take: Global geopolitics within the current rules as we understand it don’t allow for countries to genuinely respect each other as equals. Might will always be right on the global stage regardless of whether it should be that way. So when it comes to picking a global hegemon, the United States is really not a terrible choice compared with the alternatives.

          • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            Ukraine is not, objectively could not qualify before 2014 when it became good for the US war machine for them to qualify, and most importantly, NATO should’ve disbanded in 1991 when the sole reason for its existence fell.

            • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, our country is shitty. I get the main reason the US joined the allies had more to do with politics then ideology. But least some kind of good comes from the US backing ukraine.

            • boonhet@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 months ago

              1991 when the sole reason for its existence fell

              Russia still exists so what are you on about?

              The soviet union doesn’t, but the power was always concentrated into Russia, and guess what, Russia wants their territory back now. The countries which existed under the USSR and never want Russian rule again? Russia sees them as rightfully theirs. I for one am glad to have NATO protection. And I’m glad something is being done to help our brothers in Ukraine, because they weren’t as lucky as we were, to join the EU and NATO.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    208
    ·
    2 months ago

    For those who don’t know (there are probably a few) Bernie is Jewish, and his opinions better reflect the rest of us Jews than the crazies on the right (and left) and in Israel. I don’t have stats, but every American Jew I’ve talked to about this has been morally outraged and frankly mortified by Israel’s actions. We understand how it looks to the rest of the world. Don’t let the antisemitism arguments (usually pushed by Christians btw) fool you. Bernie is on the right side of this issue, as usual.

    • ALQ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fellow American Jew here. Very much agreed. Israel doesn’t represent us, even if it tries to say it does.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        79
        ·
        2 months ago

        Texan Jew here. I’m surrounded by a sea of monsters.

        I’ve made documentaries, art projects, and memorials for family members who were in the Holocaust. A few survived (literally, like, 3 of them), but multitudes more were killed. My family and community has praised me for my passionate interest and attempts to teach younger generations the dangers of complacency and compartmentalizing. One of my relatives even helped pass a law adding Holocaust Remembrance Week as part of the curriculum for every grade level in Texas.

        We’ve seen this kind of destruction before, we’ve lived this oppression and violence before. We have discussed how our family might have changed had over 90% of them not been killed.

        HOW THE FUCK IS MY FAMILY AND COMMUNITY OKAY WITH ANOTHER GENOCIDE???

        The self-delusion, what-abouts, stereotypes, and straight-up racist insults.

        “They’d kill us if given the opportunity”
        YOU’RE ALREADY KILLING THEM

        “These are really bad, violent people”
        THEY ARE CHILDREN AND CIVILIANS AND THEY ARE DYING

        “It’s not comparable to the Holocaust. Germany killed 6 million…”

        THAT’S YOUR FUCKING CUTOFF???

        WE GOTTA WAIT FOR 6 MILLION PEOPLE TO DIE BEFORE WE CAN EMPATHIZE WITH VICTIMS OF GENOCIDE??? Where was this sense of calm and nonchalance when Nazis were posting propaganda around town? How many of your kids need to be dismembered and vaporized before you say “this is more than upsetting, this is WRONG”??!

        I swear, I’m probably less than a month away from hearing someone I once respected say “the Palestinian cries out in pain as they hit you.”

        • ALQ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          2 months ago

          Omfg I feel you so hard on this with a few people, but am fortunate to not be in Texas.

          “Never again,” my ass. Those types of people mean only “never again for me and mine.” Genocide is genocide is genocide, regardless of whether we’re the victim or not.

          • Revan343@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            2 months ago

            Israel learned the wrong lesson from the Holocaust. They decided that the next time somebody gets stepped on, they’re going to be the boot, not the bug.

            • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              There are always amoral opportunists. Unfortunately, they are pulling the strings in Israel right now.

              If good people don’t vote in the US in November, we will be no better.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          2 months ago

          “It’s not comparable to the Holocaust. Germany killed 6 million…”

          There are fewer than 6 million people in all of Palestine. If that’s their cutoff, they can eradicate everyone and “it still wouldn’t be as bad.” That’s probably their thought process.

        • katharta@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          It wasn’t OK when the Egyptians and Germans did it to the Jews, and it’s not OK when the Jews are doing it to others too.

          Thank you for sharing your experience.

            • Revan343@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t discount there being good people in Texas or elsewhere in the south, I just know there are a whole lot of bad people as well, who tend to be more likely to hold political power.

              If you like hip-hop, listen to Anne Braden by Flobots

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        Another American Jew chiming in. Israel has never represented me. I’m from Indiana. I have far more in common with a Palestinian-American from Tuscon, Arizona than I do any Jew in Haifa.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          no, you MUST identify with the vision of a Jewish ethnostate, it is after all supposed to be your ethnostate… you know, the one whose existence is, for a lot of people, literally justified by the 14 words (but replace white with Jewish)? /s.

    • UmeU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s the Christian zionists here in the US that support this genocide because they think it will help expedite the end of the world

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      I realize this is very sensitive issue and things have likely changed since april, but the last time I saw this polled Jewish Americans support Israel’s response to Oct.7 about 62%, 33% oppose

      Granted, since april and just off the top of my head, Israel has bombed a number of Gaza refugee camps, killed the Hamas negotiator, conducted two terror attacks against Lebanon, and now is talking about sending ground troops in across the border,… so… yea maybe things have changed

      But im glad to have Sanders pushing for this though, I think it carries more weight coming from him.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ugh that’s shameful, and super disappointing. But thanks, I hadn’t seen a poll on American Jews as recent as April so I’d bet those numbers haven’t changed much. Seems the Jews I’m around have a very different relationship with Israel than the majority.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I’ll hazard a guess that your circle is one mainly of highly educated city folk.

          Quite independently of Religion, Education and one’s level of exposure to all sorts of people and complex social environments (which normally comes with big city life) seem to be the biggest deciding factors about people having or not “traditional values” (read: conservative) and the excessive and blind tribalism that makes them more likely to find excuses to support Genocide along ethnic lines “when our side does it”.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fun fact: Sanders consistently out-performed Hillary in head-to-head matchups against Trump.

      The same establishment that derailed Sanders and propped Hillary up were the same ones trying to force Biden down our throats while castigating any dissent.*

      *I know the progressives supported Biden until the end, but this was purely a strategic reason where if anything, their calls for Biden to step aside might’ve had the opposite effect.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        I won a porterhouse from a steakhouse over Hilary losing.

        I’d rather I hadn’t won. The bet was made in primary season, and that Hilary would get the nomination and lose the election. (There was a second part that said if Bernie won the nomination he’d be POTUS)

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d eat a hundred well-done steaks from Denny’s topped with ketchup if it meant we didn’t have to deal with Trump again.

      • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m in tinfoil hat territory, but it’s logical that Hillary was promised the Sec State position and superdelegate support for conceding to Obama and not making it a convention fight. It explains why the r’s only attacked her for 8 years outside Obama, they knew they didn’t have to attack any other potential candidate.

        • lobut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t think that’s tinfoil hat at all. I mean it seems like a very logical explanation and the same thoughts I had when I was watching it happen.

          I still remember when Hillary went to Obama before conceding and most were speculating it was going to be about a cabinet position and her running after Obama did.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 months ago

    Bernie is always on top of these things, and you have to respect him for that.

    Polls have consistently found that the majority of the public supports an end to Israel’s genocide; a poll by the Institute for Global Affairs released this week found, for instance, that a majority of Americans think the U.S. should stop supporting Israel or make support contingent on Israeli officials’ agreement to a ceasefire deal. This includes nearly 80 percent of Democrats.

    Even though 80% of Democrats are for this kind of bill watch, the majority of Congress vote against it, including the Democrats.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 months ago

        yeah I don’t understand why anyone would just comment “Mac loves and idolizes Bernie” unprompted. what a dingus

      • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Big brained independent thinker over here independently thunking away. What kinda ideas will they come up with? None, but he will make it clear he doesn’t like yours. Cause if he did then he wouldn’t be independent anymore!

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I just think idolizing politicians (and people in general (like celebrity worship)) is gross and is how we got to where we’re at.

          Sorry i offended you.

      • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        You realize love can also mean you strongly like it, right? I love pizza and wings. So what’s exactly going though your mind when I take it home?

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is still an action of the “we want to influence Israel, but keep them as our ally” kind.

      That doesn’t work. To make them listen, you must be willing to actually let them die. To drop them under the bus.

      Same goes for Turkey, Russia, Pakistan.

      Well, geopolitics make this a dangerous approach, but one should remember always than anything short of that readiness is not leverage.

      So what they should be voting on is this AND dissolving the alliance. Of course one shouldn’t make threats of clearly hostile action while still allied, this bites long-term.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    2 months ago

    We could be at the end of Bernie’s second term right now if Hillary hadn’t staged a hostile takeover of the DNC during the primary.

    trump would have been nothing more than a dated joke from TV reruns, Covid would have been handled appropriately, pretty much everyone would be measurably better off.

    Dont forget what the moderate branch stole from us, they’re still the ones running shit. That’s not just an expression, literally the same people from back then are still running the DNC and in the current administration, they’re literally still the ones running shit.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      The reason HRC won the primary is that she got 17 million votes and Sanders only got 13 million.

      • TwistedTurtle@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        …because the media and DNC conspired to make Bernie look like he was a crazy person who had no chance (basically the opposite of what they do for Trump). They used classic “tail wagging the dog” tactics to gaslight the left, downplay Bernie’s support, and coronate Hillary.

        If they hadn’t been actively sabatoging him the entire fucking time he had an excellent chance.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Are you saying that the DNC has mind control powers over 4 million Americans, making them vote for Hillary despite themselves?

          Because if that were true, Hillary would be president.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            2 months ago

            This is such a deeply bad faith argument but, yea, that’s what advertising is and several media outlets coordinated with the campaign to box out Sanders and portray his ideas as fringe.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I mean, what you’re describing is simply politics. Who gave you the idea that media are supposed to stay neutral in an election?

              When the Michigan Chronicle and Houston Defender endorse Harris and say Trump is dangerous to democracy, that’s politics. On the opposite side, Fox News has been portraying all Democrats as fringe for decades. They are not merely allowed to do that, that’s what we expect the media to do in a democracy.

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t disagree - the media does have an implicit bias… but rarely do they cooperate directly with a campaign. Donna Brazile was fired over how overt it got.

                The Sanders/Clinton primary was an example of how powerful dark money can be in campaigns and is a terrible portent of how centrists can create an uneven playing field where money rather than policy or appeal will dictate the winner.

                I’d clarify that nothing the Clinton campaign did was illegal - but they absolutely prevented us from having a fair election.

              • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 months ago

                Media is supposed to be neutral and was until the 90s. Media is not supposed to take any particular side. You’re confusing the medias right and responsibility to criticize government with extreme bias against part of government.

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  That’s not true. Media have been endorsing and supporting particular candidates since the beginning.

                  One hundred years ago, the NYT endorsed John Davis for president over Calvin Coolidge. They weren’t neutral.

                • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Media : plural of medium. The media “are” biased. That’s inherent. With the internet, the media were supposed to be infinity minus one. That’s probably the 90s you’re dreaming of. Look up the history of yellow journalism. There’s fantastic journalism out there, and some of it is mainstream.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      No but vote blue no matter who amirite.

      No possible way another lunatic will replace Trump by next election, he’s just a one of a kind republican candidate totally nor representative of a systemic problem.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Its pretty fucked up how law seems to mean less and less nowdays. to think there even needs to be such vote about america sending weapons to country breaking international laws and doing terrorist shit.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      when exactly did you feel like international law meant something, and what events made you feel so? genuinely would like to know

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Growing up in America there’s definitely an initial feeling of “law and order” ruling many of America’s past with interfering in other countries affairs, eventually you learn about the fucked up shit if you actually start looking though lol.

        I remember I did a presentation in middle school about Operation Paperclip and most of the class thought I was making it up lol.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          L&O, America, what bullshit.

          now don’t get me wrong, better than nations like Russia for sure, but there is a reason most lawful-anything carters get called out as lawful stupid in DnD, it just doesn’t work

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        But it isn’t even international law, these are domestic laws forbidding sending weapons to nations that interfere with US humanitarian aid that have been flouted repeatedly and with the barest semblance of an excuse made. I can see them not paying attention to UN “laws” but this isnt the same thing.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          you seem to misunderstand what a sovereign is, you see the US government, as being the only sovereign entity in the US can literally do whatever it wants. who’s going to stop them? a handful of militia men?

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I thought it meant something, as they bothered to even pretend there is international law by having one in first place.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s wild to me that Americans are suddenly playing moral police on this. America sells weapons to just about every dictatorship or oppressive government, to this day. Including Saudis, the ones who blew up the trade center. It seems hypocritical how hard Sanders and others are going, demanding the stop of weapons sales to just Israel. Why not the rest of the world?

  • Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    The resolutions are not likely to pass; even if they did pass the heavily pro-Israel Congress, they would likely be vetoed by President Joe Biden, who has been insistent on sending weapons to Israel with no strings attached.

    Yeah, this is an absolute shame. He tried doing something similar shortly after the genocide had started, but everyone else currently in power just shut him down almost unanimously.

    If politics and getting into power wasn’t 90% based on your wealth and connections, maybe US could have more people like Bernie trying to actually do good rather than trying to enrich or empower themselves.

    • dgmib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      If they’re forced to vote on it, at least we’ll know which politicians have a spine and which have a padded wallet.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’m glad he’s giving me a chance to have yet another demonstration of how shitty our country is. Can’t wait to see this fail miserably and anyone who votes for it lose their re-election.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 months ago

      File that one behind the what-if of a Gore Presidency. We keep missing the alternate timelines we should have taken. Here’s hoping we don’t screw up once again.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Imagine a back-to-back two term each Gore then Bernie presidency. We’d be living in a utopia, and I’m not even American