![](https://discuss.online/pictrs/image/b7aed098-32e9-417d-97b9-1a8065cb2ed4.png)
![](https://lemmy.nz/pictrs/image/2fd3e262-be28-41a6-9bb5-06c0eb8b3f9d.png)
She killed it in the expanse so this makes me happy!
She killed it in the expanse so this makes me happy!
Honestly yes! I made a strong bold statement its only fair to ask for references.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDUvCLAp0uU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8x_E1pMSHE
https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/abs/10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.236.01.04
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sgt/gt/2000/00000041/00000006/4106186
So here are a few general video’s along with a few interesting papers regarding storing HLW as/in glass-ceramics. The academic research and discussion of this immobilization methods is very robust so lots of stuff you can read on that subject.
BUT we dont have to store Fission HLW if we reprocess it and run it in conjunction with other reactor types like LIFTR. Much of the remaining waste produced in currently operating reactors is still mostly unused and at most 5-10% of the total material is used up. We can pass that through a breeder reactor and convert U238 to P239 which turns “useless” naturally occurring non fissile uranium into fissile plutonium.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium-239
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzQ3gFRj0Bc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaC2pvDMPc0&t=603s
So, my point is that assuming we keep using low enrichment uranium to power current BWR/PWR reactors we have an existing solution for the waste (which if ALL of the worlds HLW was combined would not even fill a professional stadium) that easily takes care of all the waste created since we started production.
BUT all that waste is actually fuel if we recycle/reprocess it and we can burn up another large percentage of that waste and its remaining elements are generally shorter lived forms of waste.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301421510007263
That is simply not true, storage is a solved problem, and the reason for not having locations is a political problem. NIMBY (Not in my back yard) keeps the world from having permanent storage locations, not science.
You forgot all the heavy metals too! Lots of brutal heavy metals in coal emissions and waste, which we dont get even in low level fission waste.
many times, shucking is a very valid way to get large format disks for cheaper than retail NAS parts. But be aware of what your buying and make sure that the disk your getting if its a white label is a reliable disk. WD Easystore/Mybook are generally good, as are the larger format Seagate external.
Im not sure Intel has any worthwhile CPU’s unless you are getting them used.
Currently E cores are mostly trash, and not all that “efficient” and letting a P Core turbo up and get the task completed uses less overall power.
Secondly Intel is lying about its heat output, and power use. Everything from 10th gen up is a power hog if you dont limit the performance to well below “stock” settings.
https://www.techspot.com/review/2612-intel-core-i5-13500/
This is a good match up between an i5-13500 vs R5 7600, which is the most interesting IMO. The R5 7600 seems to be about $15 less expensive for just the CPU and uses 3/4ths the power which will be a greater savings over time vs Intel. The AMD Motherboards also still seem to trend a bit lower in cost than Intel.
So overall its a good question. If you can get a use 13500 or one under $150 then its probably worth it, but at retail prices the 7600 will cost less to buy, and less to own while being similar in performance.
As a middle-aged white guy you can take my privilege out of my cold dead hands /s
Oppression, economic disenfranchisement, implicit slavery, oh yeah and racism.
Bring back the Pebble watch, its been dead for years and is still the best “smart watch”!
Probably nothing unless a really good deal from my wish list shows up.
Create 3 VM’s and pass-through disks to each VM. Boom ceph cluster on a single computer.
ZFS/BRTFS might still be better, but if you really want Ceph this should work and provide expansion and redundancy at a block device level, though you wont have any hardware redundancy regarding power/nodes.
I have and I have done unifi. I don’t like being restricted to their NVR or software solutions because it means I to toss the cameras if I want to extend solution with things like ptz or verifocal cameras. Want to add ai/ml detection sorry can’t do…
Unifi is good for some people but it’s not the solution for everyone. Reolink can also offer similar ecosystem experiences but also while letting you expand your system if wanted.
They do but are a poor value next to most other options.
Would not recommend this. It’s fun to tinker with but a poor substitute for real cameras.
Most cameras are self hosted but they are not marketed to consumers because they require running cables to them either for power and/or data.
Reolink camera with onvif so support can be connected to Frigate or Shinobi.
Hikvison and Dahua are common Chinese brands that have lots of options across lots of prices points but are treated as insecure or hostile iot devices required closed networks.
Costco often has camera and NVR packages that are passable.
Whenever possible make sure any camera you get is onvif so you can use it with any NVR or software.
https://www.theserverstore.com/
They also have a large ebay presence but I have purchased from both their ebay store, and their web store depending on what I needed.
Yes they are and to much proprietary firmware, software, and parts…
RISC is good!
Yep that should work.
Ubuntu server, it’s a bit more modern than Debian and has a massive install base which means someone has had your problem and fixed it before and documented it.