• kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Who ever thought punk was not progressive? At minimum it was blatantly anti-authoritarian and counter to the conservative culture in Thatcher’s UK and Reagan’s US. Why would anyone be shocked to find out that it was also pro-choice, feminist, and anti-discriminatory?

    • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because the Nazi skinheads did a great job of co-opting the punk title for most people who weren’t actually interested in punk. The news media were very complicit in pushing that specific image to undermine the punk movement to the general public.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Labor skinheads and neonazi skinheads.

            I was so sad when I discovered the Hammerskins were a thing (a White Power band inspired by Pink Floyd’s Waiting For The Worms, but without the irony, with a corresponding militant movement). The Hammerskins took their logo:

            From the Hammers banner from the movie version of Pink Floyd’s The Wall

            Which means when I reference the Hammers in parody of white power movements, I risk being associated with an actual white power movement.

            If they had balls, they’d call themselves The Worms.

            <looking up to make sure The Worms isn’t a social movement yet>