• Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Their logic is that Kamala is actively contributing to a genocide, whereas Trump is not.

    This is literally the most braindead political take I’ve ever heard, and that’s saying a lot

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s a classic “technically true, but not particularly useful” information tidbit. Harris is in office, Trump isn’t.

      Of course, you could argue that Vance - as a powerful member of the US Senate - is participating in the genocide while Walz - a governor of a midwestern state with no meaningful role in foreign policy - isn’t. Equally true, but meaningless.

      The problem Harris has isn’t that Trump gets innocence-by-default by being out of office for four years. Its that she’s doggedly clinging to the “both sides” framing of the Israeli genocide and scaring off Arab-American voters as a consequence. It doesn’t matter whether Harris is better or worse than Trump when the baseline of US policy is the mass slaughter of your friends and family.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        The problem that Harris has is the mountains of propaganda working against her.

        Not saying she’s perfect, but in a practical sense the spin matters FAR more than the facts.

    • Fish [Indiana]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I agree that it’s a bad take. But at this point I think that they’re desperate, trying anything they can to get Kamala to change course. It’s an urgent issue that can be solved easily: just stop supplying weapons and aid to Israel. Four years from now, most Palestinians living in Palestine will already be dead.