Summary

Trump won Dearborn and made significant gains in Hamtramck due to anger among Arab American and Muslim communities over deaths in Gaza, Lebanon, and Yemen.

Trump received 42.48% of the vote in Dearborn and 42.7% in Hamtramck, compared to 36.26% and 46.2% for Vice President Kamala Harris, respectively.

Despite Trump’s victory in Dearborn, the Republican nominee for U.S. Senator lost to the Democratic nominee.

    • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You see, they are conservative and don’t really want progressive policies, and the Palestinian genocide gave them cover to vote for a strong patriarch that felt comfortable to them.

  • randoot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well now you’ve handed Gaza to the butcher and good luck if you want to protest without getting arrested.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      If every single Jill Stein voter had voted for Harris instead, Trump still would have won.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        They’re complete fucking idiots throwing away their vote . . . but at least they went to the trouble of voting?

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Voting is always better than not voting, yes.

          And in a functional democratic system, voting for a candidate who’s against genocide would be better than voting for a candidate who’s currently part of the government supplying the genociders.

          Sadly, the US aren’t such a system.

    • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      To be fair protesters were already being injured and arrested. I know we’re all still hurting at the election loss but let’s not kid ourselves with the current administration either.

    • dragontamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      No. The election results are a blowout, larger than just this subcommunity.

      I’m annoyed at Muslims for failing to back Harris and prevent the future atrocities. But I will not blame them. Trump got too many votes in general, and might even win the popular vote.

      EDIT: We need a bigger reckoning than just blaming a minority of the minority. I don’t want to blame Harris either, she seemed to do the best that she was given but it always was long odds given that she’s a Half-Indian Half-Black Woman. (Racism from Whites, Racism from Indians for being a race-traitor, and then sexism from everyone including minorities).

      But this is a bigger election loss than “just” a minority failing to show up to vote. We lost the Senate, Presidency, and probably the House.


      EDIT: Kamala needed to win PA, WI, and MI. She literally lost all three of them. A large outspoken minority of just one State (MI) is not to blame for the PA or WI losses.

      • Shiggles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They all get to share the blame. What are you even trying to say? “Damn guys, I voted for hitler but it’s okay he won by more than a single vote so I didn’t even matter”

        • dragontamer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I’m saying we needed like 10-million more votes to even reach parity with Biden 2020 here.

          Complaining about a few hundred-thousand votes in one, albeit important, swing state, is missing the forests for the trees. This is a resounding defeat of the Democrat’s platform this year.

          The platform goes above and beyond just Harris btw. I’m including “Fascism” and other such arguments we used online / memes that clearly didn’t work well enough. We need to talk about everything and prepare for 2026 and 2028.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            The platform goes above and beyond just Harris btw. I’m including “Fascism” and other such arguments we used online / memes that clearly didn’t work well enough.

            I’ve been trying to say that for ages, but got called (and still get called) a MAGA troll.

      • astrsk@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I don’t want to blame Harris either, she seemed to do the best that she was given but it always was long odds given that she’s a Half-Indian Half-Black Woman. (Racism from Whites, Racism from Indians for being a race-traitor, and then sexism from everyone including minorities).

        This is bullshit rhetoric. She ran a shit campaign of trying to appease republican voters and cater to the snowflake right wing fear machine by shushing Palestine voices to back genocide directly and trying to sound tougher on immigration and border policy in the face of literal fascist policy campaigns by Trump. This is 100% the fault and failure of the Harris campaign’s strategy and the DNC for being so chicken shit scared of losing that they kept the corpse in chief in the running for too long. Catering to the fascist right policies never works and ignoring insanely popular progressive policy always fails. The beatings will continue until morale improves.

        • macattack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I will say a large swath of the country moved to the right (anti-immigration, anti-trans, etc) and so trying to push progressive values in a time where people believe progressive values are what led to inflation is a losing argument as well that wouldn’t have gotten much national support.

          There were literal commercials framing Kamala as a villain for having empathy about trans people in prison.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I agree with you in general but you should be blaming Harris. Have you even been keeping up with her campaign? I couldn’t believe that shit and I’m not even American. She managed to squander a massive headstart by… Being Harris.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It means they understand sweet FA about American politics and wish to lecture us on American politics.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Harris’s campaign sucked even in the eyes of me, a non-American who doesn’t keep up with the nitty gritty of American politics. She had a massive headstart (remember the first while after her nomination? She was basically a messiah for democrats) and managed to lose it with her wishy washy attitude and right wing policies.

            • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              6 hours ago

              In another thread you were commenting how much you liked that Shitface won, and now you want people to convince that you don’t care about US politics but hoped Harris would’ve been a better candidate, without ever saying anything specific?

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 minutes ago

                Since I responded to your other claim earlier, here I’ll just say this:

                I never said I didn’t care about US politics. I said I don’t keep up with the nitty gritty, meaning the details of the policies being discussed. For example, I knew that Harris was adopting a right wing stance on immigration, but only today found out she had promised to build a border wall.

              • RandomGen1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                52 minutes ago

                I gave their profile a cursory look, but I couldn’t find this in the few handfuls of posts I looked at. Do you have a link to a comment or two showing this, maybe I missed it?

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                6 hours ago
                • Completely adopting the right-wing framing on immigration. Ended up running in favor of the most right-wing and damaging immigration bill. (She adopted it because Trump rejected the bill because he wanted to run on it.)

                • Signing on to continue Trump’s stupid border wall.

                • Adopting a policy on Gaza that was as favorable to Israel as any official policy of the Republicans.

                • Not challenging state-level laws against trans people, largely taking a state’s right position on the matter.

                • Seeking out and running on endorsements from Dick Cheney and other prominent Republicans.

                • Embracing fracking when fracking isn’t even supported by a majority of Pennsylvanians.

                • Completely abandoning medicare for all, not even making the public option a major part of her campaign.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The lack of support for Harris among Arab-Americans may not have been rational, but it was completely predictable—and it was something the Harris campaign could have addressed by at least suggesting she might reconsider Biden’s policies.

    Blame isn’t zero-sum—we’re all responsible for the predictable results of our actions (or inactions), even if those results were overdetermined.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s still really, really fucking stupid to vote trump. These people fucked up in the stupidest way possible with their one vote.

      Preventably. Reasonably. Knowingly.

  • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Hey don’t I remember reading 189,237,490 conversations about this exact thing for the last 8 months? Where everyone was begging third party voters to bite the bullet, please, for the sake of the future of democracy in America and even a slight attempt at survival for Gaza and y’all all told us to go fuck ourselves because we all love genocide? Yeah remember those conversations?

    Anything to add now? Are you happy? We told you this would happen. We begged you to please reconsider your stance for the good of everyone. But no, we’re just a bunch of dumb assholes who aren’t educated enough about the war in the middle east.

    Learn to see the world around you, please.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Third party voters didn’t do this. Trump still won by a lot even if all 3rd party went blue. Don’t act so smug.

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This study from 2014 really explains this election for me.

      For the bottom 90% of the US population, democracy fundamentally does not exist. The actions of legislators reflect the opinions of the wealthiest 10% of the population.

      “Democracy,” for 90% of the population, is a complete sham. Since 2016, Democrats SHOULD have been taking a hard left turn towards progressive populism. They should have been pursuing policies that are actually popular among the common people, even if those are unpopular among their wealthy donors. But while they ran on the idea of democracy, Democrats have done NOTHING to make their party actually reflect the needs of regular people. They should have been offering a bold vision to help the American people. But the DNC decided that the whims of donors was more important, and they lost as a result.

      Why would you expect people to care for a democracy that means nothing to them?

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Why would you expect people to care for a democracy that means nothing to them?

        Because the other alternative is to take everything you hate about the way it all works and make it objectively worse, balanced even worse out of your own favor.

        Look, I do understand that American democracy is fundamentally broken, and I empathize with that. I too wish for a viable third party candidate to break us out of this hellscape. But this wasn’t the time. So instead I voted for the party that’s been pushing RCV initiatives in some areas rather than handing a win to the party that promised they would abolish elections. On one hand we have a possible path forward and on the other hand we have guaranteed destruction, I don’t like it any more than the next person but I consider a vote against guaranteed destruction to have been one that wasn’t wasted. I hate that that is what American politics have come to at this point in time but I can observe the world around me and act accordingly.

    • fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      THEY WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED AND THE RESULTS WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SAME. You are willing to hurt down ballot races.

      Take some responsibility for YOUR CANDIDATE.