• Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Article 51(7) of Protocol I:

    The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield, favour or impede military operations. The Parties to the conflict shall not direct the movement of the civilian population or individual civilians in order to attempt to shield military objectives from attacks or to shield military operations.

    That one.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel, to their credit, are taking steps to avoid civilian casualties, including leaflet drops, phone calls, and the infamous “roof knocking”.

          • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Being militarily more powerful does not imply that they don’t want to avoid civilian casualties. Fighting an enemy who primarily employ terrorist tactics causes a large amount of civilian casualties, and Gaza being one of the most densely populated areas in the world makes it even worse.

            If we consider some sort of an upper limit how many civilians you theoretically could kill, there’s nazis. They killed 1,5 million jews in 100 days. And that’s only jews. Now, you don’t have to be redoing the holocaust in order to qualify for an atrocity of course, but Israel is definetely not trying to kill as many civilians as they can. This would look very different if they were.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_State_of_Palestine#Demographics_of_the_Gaza_Strip – their population growth is #34 in the world.