• PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a war, so you are basically talking about an urban assault involving thousands of IDF infantry kicking doors down house to house and shooting anyone who shoots at them.

    The US did that in Fallujah, and it’s pretty gnarly. US had 500 casualties IIRC. The US also told all the residents to evacuate Fallujah before the operation went down.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      America tried bombing a million innocent civilians from the comfort of their lazy ass Texas seat too. Remind me whether they won that war. Surely they didn’t leave a giant power vacuum and created many more resistance fighters.

      • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Majority of deaths in iraq were during the civil war and the insurgency that followed, the 1 million figure that gets banded about with little evidence is in no way “civillians killed by NATO”.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          America purposely targeted civilian infrastructure at the start of their attack to cripple and kill the population and ruin their economy. They did not target military goals.

          The 1 million figure is widely accepted.

          • Apollo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t disagree, but given that the majority of the deaths happened uears later I think its niave to suggest that the USA killed 1 million iraqis.

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s why they’re using this strategy. If there were a ton of Israeli soldier casualties on Bibi’s watch, the military might let the public remove him from power, or do it themselves. Netanyahu has every motivation to bomb and starve Gaza. The actual solution would have been to build up Palestinian groups who oppose Hamas and prefer a two state solution, but that isn’t the IDF’s goal. Their refusal to do so over the last few decades not only led to this war, but should have told supportive nations that too many Zionists are genocidal theocrats.

      The most economical endgame for Israel’s current military actions is the forceful expulsion of almost all Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank. Occupation is a bad option. They’ve undermined the movement for coexistence so badly that even a total reversal of policy would be difficult. It’s so fucking sad.

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        The actual solution would have been to build up Palestinian groups who oppose Hamas and prefer a two state solution, but that isn’t the IDF’s goal.

        This idea supposes that Palestinians themselves are somehow too incompetent to do it without external help. Which reality seems to agree with.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really. Israel has attacked and undermined the PLO for decades, almost more than Hamas. It’s the situation of Israel stepping on the throats of all Palestinians, even those who want to work towards peace. The two state solution requires Israel’s support, and when they don’t give it, those attempting to make it happen on the Palestinian side look like fools. Israel has the power to allow for peace, but they make it near impossible.

          Palestinians can’t make a two state solution happen without the cooperation of the other state. That’s what two state means.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t care what God will do to him; I just want to get these awful people out of power so they’ll stop killing children. God making things right in the afterlife isn’t a universally agreed upon truth, so we must do the right thing regardless of its existence. If God is good, surely he’d want us to make our mortal existence less miserable and more meaningful, right?