• Kepabar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same thing applies to humanitarian aid.

    If Hamas has hijacked or is operating in those places then they become military targets.

    As far as white phosphorus, it depends on how it’s deployed. If it’s deployed for masking, tracing or identifying then it’s legal.

    If it’s being directly used as an incendiary then that’s illegal.

    • CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point I’m making is both of those situations happened (good banks got bombed immediately after the convoy left and they have been using white phosphorus on people) and people are just looking the other way.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The news media made the same claims against the US concerning white phosphorous and that was not true so my burden of proof concerning white phosphorous is so high it actually supports the opposing narrative without some damn good evidence.