You must log in or register to comment.
monkey’s paw curls
Okay, nicotine is now a Schedule II drug. You need a prescription to buy anything with nicotine in it.
Australia actually did that a couple years ago, but only for vaping-related nicotine. Cigs were unaffected.
Good to see Australia completed unaffected by the tobacco lobby…
And unable to deal with an absolutely massive illegal tobacco and vape industry (:
Ohh no our preciouse monopoly on addiction is being undercut. Would someone think of the poor tobaco companies struggling to keep the lights on.
I mean… yeah, their motivations are obviously not pure, but having vape sellers be licensed similar to cigarette sellers and banning flavors that are marketed to kids both sound pretty reasonable IMO.
I do hate when they try and flavor things as “middle school grape” and “minors only strawberry”
Really…?
I get you’re being sarcastic here, but you and I both know that advertising and marketing can be incredibly subtle and insidious. Hell, that exact complaint is half the content posted to Lemmy. Making your product in flavors that appeal primarily to kids is about as blatant as it gets. What makes you think vape manufacturers are so honest?
In case you’re being serious, take a stroll down the candy or cereal aisle at your grocery store and see if you can pick out which ones are marketed to kids vs adults just by the flavors.
Do you think its the flavor that makes those kid cereals? Or do you maybe think its the childish mascots with puzzles and games on the back of the box? Because I sure as shit wouldnt call the 4 fruit flavors of cheerios as “marketed towards children,” just as I dont think the existence of fruit is a plot by Big Agriculture to reel in the child market.
How boring is your diet? Cause this is apparently a shock for you, but most adults like sweets. We also like fruits. Theres a reason why flavored vodka isnt restricted to piss and old coffee grounds as its primary flavors. People, yes even the adult ones, like things that taste good. And, oooooh another shocker, they want the things they like to have good flavor options.
Adults also liking something in no way negates the idea that the marketing and flavors are designed to hook in kids.
Honestly, aside from a little thing like ethics, vape manufacturers would be stupid to NOT try and hook kids while they are young and impressionable, so the default assumption has to be that they are trying.
Look, I’m open to discussing in good faith, but we’re clearly talking past each other and this feels more like bickering, so I don’t see much point in continuing, other than to collect downvotes 😅
I dont think you claiming that liking the taste of grapes makes me a child is in good faith, but you can go right ahead believing that if you like.
I think I’m at a point where I don’t care what appeals to kids. I shouldn’t have to miss out on stuff I like cause a kid “could” be interested in a flavor I also like.
“But kids like fruity flavors!” OK? and what do I care? I’ve never seen anything marketing ecigs towards children.
That’s on the kid’s parents. not me. I’m a legal adult and I showed my ID and bought my stuff. Parents need to be present if they don’t want their kids hooked on stuff. And keep their kids outta adult spaces.
I don’t see the need to make it more complicated than that.
There was a whole fiasco a while back where Juul got in trouble for marketing to teens. Not explicitly, but if you had seen what ads they were pushing it was obvious they knew it would be pulling in young people.
The answer to that though is of course tighter marketing regulations, not product bans. Banning any type of vape is an absolutely laughable proposition as long as ciggies are still legal.
My little brother really likes unhealthy cheeseburgers. What can the federal government do to help if not ban cheeseburgers for everyone?
I would try a cheeseburger flavored vape
How does anyone ever regulate what “flavors marketed to kids” entails? Plenty of adults like sweet, fruity flavors. What about vanilla? Very generic yet it’d attract kids. I do think nicotine is a scourge, and smoking is waaaaaaaay worse than vaping, just wanting to know how this would work
That’s a fair question. My POV is that not being able to buy sweet fruity flavors might be inconvenient to some adults, but it’s hardly something that could be argued to cause an undue burden on vape users.
It would probably be straightforward to commission a study (or leverage existing study data) to identify the flavors that underage users are most likely to use and start there. If data shows that removing or restricting those flavors is not an impediment to underage vaping, then at that point reconsider the regulations.
Even if some manufacturers choose to skirt the regulations (no this isn’t “grape”, it’s “purple berry”!), larger companies with the biggest market share are probably not going to want to get tangled up in high visibility lawsuits, and so the likely outcome is that availability goes down, and therefore so does the access and use rate.
Let’s start with alcohol, my child won’t be dead tomorrow from a vape. They might from a grape flavored bottle of Smirnoff.
Yeah, underage drinking is also a big problem, but it’s also not one I expect vape or cigarette manufacturers to have much sway over.
I’m not sure if that was supposed to be a gotcha? Can we not look at one problem without simultaneously solving all problems?
Its a gotcha because your 50 flavors of vodka isnt considered child centric marketing, and anyone who claimed otherwise would correctly be called a moron.
But you are doing the exact same dance with vapes.
I vape bc it’s supposedly a little better for my health but when I’m in NYC I just smoke cigarettes bc flavored vapes are banned and tobacco/nonflavored vapes taste worse than cigs somehow lmao.
I feel like moving smokers from a less harmful alternative bc “think of the kids” is stupid. Like yeah I started smoking as a teenager too and I do regret having started, but the fruity flavors didn’t make it enticing, it was the fact that I was a teenager and I wasn’t supposed to be doing it. But disregarding my anecdotal experience, it still seems like a move that would shift people back to inhaling burning plant matter, rat poison, and tar into their lungs instead of vegetable oil and nicotine salts.
It’s less a “think of the kids” issue and more that the vast majority of smokers and vapers start as teens / young adults so there is a huge incentive to get them started and hooked early. It would just be naiive to think cig and vape makers don’t know this and take advantage.
Just as a thought experiment, imagine a strawberry flavored cigarette was released tomorrow. It would be so transparent the maker would be absolutely crucified the moment it hit shelves.
All that said, legislation should be based on data and solid studies, not just gut feeling and common sense. I could be wrong here, but the profit motive to get people hooked on addictive products early is just too strong to not look verrrry suspect.
Sweet is a taste not a flavour and vapes are always sweet because PG and VG is. If anything you could argue brussel sprouts vs. apples but last I checked, adults eat apples.
Also to be consistent you need to outlaw like 98% of liqueurs out there as them containing fruit obviously means they’re targeted towards children.
I don’t vape, except occasional cannabis-based products which I understand use a different solvent, so I’ll have to take your word on that. But there’s a difference between the presence of sweetness vs sweet flavors that typically (or more to the point are designed to) appeal more to younger people. Whether or not those flavors still appeal to adults is kinda moot–as it’s been pointed out already, lots of things that appeal greatly to kids still appeal to adults.
The crux of it is if vape makers are generating flavored vapes to try and appeal to younger buyers (which carries a massive financial incentive), I think most people would agree that’s not ok. Whether banning those flavors is the right answer I guess would be a matter for study and debate.
This is just a weird feeling thread to be honest, since Lemmy tends to skew massively cynical about being marketed to, especially by billion dollar corps, but the vibe I’m getting here is skepticism that those billion dollar vape manufacturers might be exploiting some simple psychology to get kids hooked early.
And for what it’s worth, I’m sure liquor manufacturers do the same thing to some degree, but it’s kind of a different ball game since you don’t need to get people addicted to alcohol young in order to have them continue to drink as an adult, and most adults who drink are not physically addicted, as with nicotine. Maybe coffee would be a better comparison…
It was not companies who started the whole thing. People have been vaping fruity and dessert aromas back in the days where you still had to build your own vape (usually from torches, hence the term “mod” for the battery holder/control unit: They’re modded torches. Literally).
And that btw is also what would happen again if you were to outlaw those flavours: People would again buy bog-standard PG-based food aroma to mix their juice. It’s a good thing that companies are actually selling vape aroma as vape aroma because it means that you can expect it to not contain some problematic stuff.
Or are you, on your crusade, going to outlaw food aroma in general?
and most adults who drink are not physically addicted, as with nicotine.
Nicotine on its own is roughly as addictive as caffeine, look at any recent study. Don’t confuse it with the MAOIs in cigarettes, or indeed the MAOI/nicotine synergy. The “nicotine is more addictive than heroin” and shit line is actually a Tobacco industry thing to sell light cigarettes. Still of course contain the full brunt of MAOIs.
As to “don’t advertise to kids”: Yeah no shit. If companies would be using cartoon characters and whatnot we should outlaw it. There’s no issue with outlawing it even if they don’t. But to lash onto fruits as “evidence” that they’re targeting kids is inane, you should rather look into things like disposable vapes, everything that lowers the barriers to entry away from the “screw atomiser on mod, squeeze in juice” baseline.
Regulatory capture. Be a big business. Lobby (give money to) politicians to get regulated. Make sure you have the money to implement the regulations. Make sure almost no one else has the money or opportunity to get the money to implement the regulations. Regulations force competitors out of business or make it possible to buy them. Regulations make it impossible for anyone new to compete against you. 3) Profit
This time last year we had Meta burning millions on commercials saying “the laws for the internet were passed on 1996. That’s older than I am. We need new regulations to keep the internet safe.” Aka it’s not enough to buy all our competitors, we need to make sure no startups are even possible. We have the money and we want to make the rules.
I think it’s really important that someone is finally standing up to Big Vape. This is a very brave move by Big Tobacco.
Removed by mod
…huh?
Are you channeling a tobacco executive?
Removed by mod
I haven’t smoked in a few years, but your original statement is rather wierd.
Smoking and vaping are hideous habits.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The London-based tobacco company BAT has called for “more stringent” regulations on vaping, including a licensing regime similar to alcohol and cigarettes.
It sells Rothmans and Lucky Strike cigarettes, and is the most successful of the big western tobacco companies when it comes to the UK’s booming market for disposable vapes, thought to be worth at least £3bn a year.
The company also wants a ban on soft drink, sweet or dessert flavours such as gummy bear or cotton candy, which it says appeal “uniquely” to the young.
The Local Government Association has called for single-use vapes to be banned, as they cause a litter problem and a fire risk in bin lorries, and appeal too strongly to children.
However, it does not support a ban on colourful packaging, nor on advertising or sports sponsorship – as it argues that these are still an important way to convince smokers to switch.
If you are reading this page and can’t see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your question or comment or you can email us at HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk.
The original article contains 474 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
I guess it’d be less catchy if it’d said vape firm calls for tighter regulation on vapes. 🤷🏻♂️
